Abstract
Abbreviations: ALD, aldehyde; DMA, dimethylacetal; FA, fatty acid; NRRL, Northern Regional Research Laboratory
Published online ahead of print on 1 August 2003 as DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.02719-0.
The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequences of strains NRRL B-23456T and NRRL B-23458T are AF445264 and AF445239, respectively.
Table 1. Cellular fatty acid compositions (%) of Hespellia stercorisuis NRRL B-23456T and Hespellia porcina NRRL B-23458T
To determine the phylogenetic affinity between the isolates and to other species, their 16S rRNA gene sequences were amplified by PCR and sequenced, yielding a continuous stretch of >1450 bases. The four isolates formed two groups on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity. Strains PC17 and PC18T were found to be genetically highly related to each other, displaying 100 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, as did isolates PC80T and PC82. However, 3 % 16S rRNA gene sequence divergence was shown between the two groups. Sequence searches of GenBank/EMBL revealed that the unidentified isolates were members of the low-G+C Clostridium subphylum of Gram-positive bacteria. Treeing analysis revealed that the isolates were members of the Clostridium coccoides rDNA cluster. The phylogenetic position of the two groups of isolates (represented by strains PC18T and PC80T) within the C. coccoides grouping is shown in Fig. 1.
|
It is evident from both phenotypic and comparative 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis that the anaerobic, Gram-positive, rod-shaped isolates that were recovered from pig manure fall into two taxonomically distinct groups. Phylogenetically, the unidentified isolates are members of the C. coccoides group (rDNA cluster XIVa; Collins et al., 1994), a large suprageneric cluster that embraces taxa with a variety of generic names, such as Anaerostipes, Butyrivibrio, Catonella, Clostridium, Coprococcus, Dorea, Eubacterium, Johnsonella, Lachnospira, Roseburia, Ruminococcus and Sporobacterium. Within this suprageneric rDNA group, the two pairs of isolates formed a distinct and robust subcluster that was supported by a bootstrap value of 100 % (Fig. 1). Based on both sequence divergence and tree topology considerations, it is clear that the unidentified isolates do not possess a particularly close association with any described species. The nearest apparent relative to the new isolates corresponds to an rDNA clone (designated OTU-95; 1453 bases) that was derived from an uncultured organism from the gastrointestinal tract of pigs (Leser et al., 2002). However, 6·16·4 % sequence divergence between the pig manure isolates and this uncultured organism and the low bootstrap resampling value (Fig. 1) indicate that this association is not particularly close. Leser et al. (2002) published a comprehensive rDNA inventory of the pig gastrointestinal tract and described over 300 novel phylotypes, which may correspond to as-yet-uncharacterized bacterial genera or species. Surprisingly, none of these novel lines corresponded to either of the two groups of isolates reported here. Taxonomically, it is evident that the two groups of unknown isolates represent closely related, albeit different, species. 16S rRNA gene sequence divergence of 3 % is consistent with separate species (Stackebrandt & Goebel, 1994) and the two groups show major phenotypic differences. Before the advent of 16S rRNA gene sequencing, the two swine manure species would have been considered taxonomically to conform to the genus Eubacterium, which has in the past acted as a repository for strictly anaerobic, Gram-positive, asporogenous, rod-shaped organisms. However, it is now acknowledged universally that the eubacteria represent a phylogenetically very heterogeneous group of organisms and there is a growing consensus that the genus Eubacterium should be restricted to the type species Eubacterium limosum and its close phylogenetic relatives (Eubacterium barkeri, Eubacterium callanderi and Eubacterium aggregans) (Willems & Collins, 1996; Kageyama et al., 1999). E. limosum and related species are far removed phylogenetically (approx. 20 % 16S rRNA gene sequence divergence) from the unidentified isolates reported here and belong to a different phylogenetic group (Collins et al., 1994; Willems & Collins, 1996). Furthermore, the unknown isolates are incompatible phenotypically with eubacteria, as they do not produce butyrate as a major fermentation product. Based on phylogenetic findings, it is evident that the unidentified isolates form a distinct group and do not display a close affinity to any recognized genus within the C. coccoides rDNA cluster. The unknown organisms also differ phenotypically from all other genera within this suprageneric grouping. For example, they can be distinguished from clostridial species and other spore-forming taxa (e.g. Sporobacterium) in not producing endospores, from Lachnospira by the absence of curved cellular shapes, from Dorea by hydrolysis of starch and the end products of glucose metabolism, from Coprococcus and Ruminococcus by cellular morphology and the end products of glucose fermentation and from Roseburia and Butyrivibrio in the end products of glucose metabolism (i.e. not producing butyric acid) and in being non-motile. Based on their overall phenotypic and phylogenetic resemblance, combined with their distinctiveness from other members of the C. coccoides group, we consider that the two unidentified species merit classification in a novel genus, Hespellia gen. nov. We propose that isolates PC17 and PC18T should be classified as Hespellia stercorisuis sp. nov. and isolates PC80T and PC82 should be designated Hespellia porcina sp. nov.
Description of Hespellia gen. nov.
Hespellia (Hes.pel'li.a. N.L. fem. n. Hespellia to honour the late American microbiologist Robert B. Hespell, in recognition of his many contributions to anaerobic microbiology).
Gram-positive-staining, non-spore-forming, non-motile, rod-shaped cells. Strictly anaerobic and catalase- and oxidase-negative. Glucose and some other sugars are fermented. Major end products of glucose metabolism are formic, acetic, lactic and propionic acids; hydrogen is produced. Butyric acid is not formed. Aesculin and starch are hydrolysed, but gelatin is not. Indole-negative. Nitrate is not reduced to nitrite. Long-chain cellular FAs consist of complex mixtures of FAs and DMAs, together with small amounts of ALDs. DNA G+C content is 43·743·8 mol%. The type species of the genus is Hespellia stercorisuis.
Description of Hespellia stercorisuis sp. nov.
Hespellia stercorisuis (ster.co.ri.su'is. L. masc. n. stercus, -oris faeces, manure; L. gen. n. suis of a pig, N.L. gen. n. stercorisuis from pig faeces/manure).
Cells consist of Gram-positive-staining rods that are obligately anaerobic, non-motile and non-spore-forming. Cells are 0·51·0 µm wide by 1·55·0 µm long and occur singly, in pairs or in short chains. After 48 h anaerobic incubation at 37 °C under a gas phase of N2 and CO2 (80 : 20, v/v) on RGM/glucose agar, colonies are grey, convex, smooth, shiny and translucent. Catalase- and oxidase-negative. Hydrogen is formed after growth on glucose. End products of metabolism from BHI broth are formic, acetic, lactic and propionic acids. Glucose, lactose, cellobiose, trehalose, amygdalin, sorbitol, maltose, mannose, sucrose, fructose and xylose are utilized as energy sources, but arabinose, inositol, raffinose, rhamnose and inulin are not. Aesculin and starch are hydrolysed, but gelatin is not. Nitrate is not reduced. Indole is not produced. Long-chain cellular FAs consist of complex mixtures of FAs and DMAs, together with small amounts of ALDs; predominant components are C14 : 0 FA, C16 : 0 FA, C16 : 1cis9 DMA and C18 : 1cis11 DMA. DNA G+C content of the type strain is 43·7 mol%.
The type strain is PC18T=NRRL B-23456T=CCUG 46279T=ATCC BAA-677T. Isolated from pig manure.
Description of Hespellia porcina sp. nov.
Hespellia porcina (por.ci'na. L. fem. adj. porcina of pigs, pertaining to pigs).
Cells are Gram-positive-staining, non-motile, non-spore-forming rods. Obligately anaerobic. Cells are 0·51·0 µm wide by 1·54·0 µm long and occur singly, in pairs or in short chains. After 48 h anaerobic incubation at 37 °C under a gas phase of N2 and CO2 (80 : 20, v/v) on RGM/glucose agar, colonies are grey, convex, smooth, shiny and translucent. Catalase- and oxidase-negative. Hydrogen is formed after growth on glucose. End products of metabolism from BHI broth are formic, acetic, lactic and propionic acids. Glucose, arabinose, inositol, maltose, mannose, sucrose, fructose and xylose are utilized as energy sources, but amygdalin, cellobiose, lactose, raffinose, rhamnose, sorbitol, trehalose and inulin are not. Nitrate is not reduced. Aesculin and starch are hydrolysed, but gelatin is not. Indole is not produced. Long-chain cellular FAs consist of complex mixtures of FAs and DMAs, together with small amounts of ALDs; predominant components are C14 : 0 FA, C14 : 0 DMA, C16 : 0 FA and C16 : 1cis9 DMA. DNA G+C content of the type strain is 43·8 mol%.
The type strain is PC80T=NRRL B-23458T=ATCC BAA-674T. Isolated from pig manure.
The authors wish to acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of Rhonda Zeltwanger.References
Collins, M. D., Lawson, P. A., Willems, A., Cordoba, J. J., Fernandez-Garayzabal, J., Garcia, P., Cai, J., Hippe, H. & Farrow, J. A. E. (1994). The phylogeny of the genus Clostridium: proposal of five new genera and eleven new species combinations. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44, 812826.
Cotta, M. A., Whitehead, T. R. & Zeltwanger, R. L. (2003). Isolation, characterization and comparison of bacteria from swine faeces and manure storage pits. Environ Microbiol 5, 737745.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dehority, B. A. & Grubb, J. A. (1976). Basal medium for the selective enumeration of rumen bacteria utilizing specific energy sources. Appl Environ Microbiol 32, 703710.
Hespell, R. B., Wolf, R. & Bothast, R. J. (1987). Fermentation of xylans by Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens and other ruminal bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 53, 28492853.
Johnson, J. L. (1994). Similarity analysis of DNAs. In Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology, pp. 655682. Edited by P. Gerhardt, R. G. E. Murray, W. A. Wood & N. R. Krieg. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
Kageyama, A., Benno, Y. & Nakase, T. (1999). Phylogenetic and phenotypic evidence for the transfer of Eubacterium aerofaciens to the genus Collinsella as Collinsella aerofaciens gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49, 557565.
Leedle, J. A. Z. & Hespell, R. B. (1980). Differential carbohydrate media and anaerobic replica plating techniques in delineating carbohydrate-utilizing subgroups in rumen bacterial populations. Appl Environ Microbiol 39, 709719.
Leser, T. D., Amenuvor, J. Z., Jensen, T. K., Lindecrona, R. H., Boye, M. & Møller, K. (2002). Culture-independent analysis of gut bacteria: the pig gastrointestinal tract microbiota revisited. Appl Environ Microbiol 68, 673690.
Miller, D. N. (2001). Accumulation and composition of odorous compounds in feedlot soils under aerobic, fermentative, and anaerobic respiratory conditions. J Anim Sci 79, 25032512.
Nicholas, K. B., Nicholas, H. B., Jr & Deerfield, D. W., II (1997). GeneDoc: analysis and visualization of genetic variation. EMBNEW News 4, 14.
Page, R. D. M. (1996). TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci 12, 357358.
Rasmussen, S. W. (1995). DNATools, a software package for DNA sequence analysis. Carlsberg Laboratory, Copenhagen.
Saitou, N. & Nei, M. (1987). The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4, 406425.[Abstract]
Spoelstra, S. F. (1980). Origin of objectionable odorous components in piggery wastes and the possibility of applying indicator components for studying odor development. Agric Environ 5, 241260.
Stackebrandt, E. & Goebel, B. M. (1994). Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44, 846849.
Whitehead, T. R. & Cotta, M. A. (2000). Characterisation and comparison of microbial populations in swine faeces and manure storage pits by 16S rDNA gene sequence analyses. Anaerobe 7, 181187.[CrossRef]
Whitehead, T. R. & Flint, H. J. (1995). Heterologous expression of an endoglucanase gene (endA) from the ruminal anaerobe Ruminococcus flavefaciens 17 in Streptococcus bovis and Streptococcus sanguis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 126, 165169.[CrossRef][Medline]
Willems, A. & Collins, M. D. (1996). Phylogenetic relationships of the genera Acetobacterium and Eubacterium sensu stricto and reclassification of Eubacterium alactolyticum as Pseudoramibacter alactolyticus gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 46, 10831087.
Yasuhara, A. & Fuwa, K. (1979). Volatile and odorous components in solid swine manure. Agric Biol Chem 43, 313316.
Yasuhara, A., Fuwa, K. & Jimbu, M. (1984). Identification of odorous compounds in fresh and rotten swine manure. Agric Biol Chem 48, 30013010.
Zahn, J. A., Hatfield, J. L., Do, Y. S., DiSpirito, A. A., Laird, D. A. & Pfeiffer, R. L. (1997). Characterization of volatile organic emissions and wastes from a swine production facility. J Environ Qual 26, 16871696.