Abstract
Abbreviations: DSR, dissimilatory sulfite reductase; SRB, sulfate-reducing bacteria
The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA and dsrAB gene sequences of strain C/L2T are AB353727 and AB218445, respectively.
A phase-contrast microphotograph of cells of strain C/L2T and a phylogenetic tree based on dsrAB gene sequences are available as supplementary material with the online version of this paper.
Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) play a major role in the mineralization of organic matter in coastal marine sediments (Jørgensen, 1982). In such environments, SRB decompose short-chain fatty acids, especially acetate, which are produced by fermentative bacteria (Sørensen et al., 1981; Winfrey & Ward, 1983; Christensen, 1984; Parkes et al., 1989; Fukui et al., 1997). Although SRB are considered to play only a limited role in the oxidation of amino acids (Burdige, 1989, 1991; Hansen & Blackburn, 1995; Parkes et al., 1989), some SRB are able to use several single amino acids: examples include species of the genera Desulfovibrio (Baena et al., 1998; Stams et al., 1985; van der Maarel et al., 1996), Desulfobacterium (Rees et al., 1998), Desulfobulbus (Sass et al., 2002), Desulfomusa (Finster et al., 2001) and Desulfotomaculum (Stams & Hansen, 1986). Hansen et al. (1993) showed that the rate of amino acid turnover was greatly inhibited by the addition of molybdate (a specific inhibitor of sulfate reduction) in experiments involving the incubation of fish food-amended sediment collected from below a marine fish farm. We also reported that the rate of sulfate reduction was more stimulated by the addition of Casamino acids than by the addition of lactate and that glutamate was accumulated in the presence of molybdate in the incubation of sediment slurry collected in the highly eutrophic area of Tokyo Bay, Japan, where algal blooms were often observed in warm seasons (Takii, 2003). These findings suggest the active participation of SRB in amino acid oxidation in sediments rich in organic matter. To isolate amino acid-utilizing SRB from sediment, enrichment culture was carried out with Casamino acids and sulfate, using surface sediment from Tokyo Bay as the inoculum. The sulfate-reducing enrichment culture obtained contained various morphologically different types of bacteria. After further enrichment with lactate and sulfate, a sulfate reducer, designated strain C/L2T, was isolated. Here, we describe this strain as representing a novel species of the genus Desulfovibrio.
Strain C/L2T originated from anoxic black sediment collected (using an Ekman dredge) from a dredged site (14 ° 00' 2'' E 3 ° 37' 19'' N) in the inner part of Tokyo Bay. The details of the site were described in a previous paper (Takii et al., 2002).
The basal medium used for the enrichment, isolation and maintenance of sulfate-reducing strains was a marine, bicarbonate-buffered, sulfide-reduced medium, described by Widdel & Bak (1992). The medium contained the following (l–1): 4.0 g Na2SO4, 0.2 g KH2PO4, 0.25 g NH4Cl, 20.0 g NaCl, 3.0 g MgCl2 . 6H2O, 0.5 g KCl and 0.15 g CaCl2 . 2H2O. The following were also added (l–1) to the autoclaved medium, after cooling under a stream of N2 gas: 1 ml SL10 trace element solution, 1 ml selenite/tungstate solution, 1 ml vitamin mixture solution, 1 ml vitamin B12 solution, 30 ml NaHCO3 solution and 7.5 ml Na2S . 9H2O solution (Widdel & Bak, 1992). The completed medium was distributed into sterile tubes or bottles (with screw caps fitted with butyl rubber discs): the vessels were filled to exclude air, unless indicated otherwise. Enrichment culture was carried out with screw-capped bottles filled with the basal medium supplemented with Casamino acids (3.5 g l–1) and inoculated with a fresh sediment sample, as described previously (Takii et al., 2007). After several transfers of sulfide-positive cultures, the culture was subjected to the agar shake dilution method (Widdel & Bak, 1992). Despite the performance of a repeated isolation procedure, the culture obtained contained two types of morphologically distinct cells. The culture was then successively enriched with basal medium supplemented with lactate (20 mM) as the sole substrate; the sulfate-reducing enrichment culture was subjected to the most-probable-number technique with the same medium. The highest dilution growing tubes were used to inoculate an agar shake culture. Purity was investigated by means of phase-contrast microscopy (Optiphot; Nikon), using cultures with various substrates. Strain C/L2T was isolated and maintained in a small screw-capped tube filled with basal medium supplemented with lactate.
The cell morphology was examined using phase-contrast microscopy. Flagella were observed under a transmission electron microscope (JEM-1010; JEOL) using exponentially growing cells without staining. Gram staining was performed using the Hucker method (Doetsch, 1981) and the KOH test was performed according to the method of Gregersen (1978).
Duplicate culture tubes were used in all experiments. Growth at various temperatures, pH values and NaCl concentrations were studied using small screw-capped tubes filled with basal medium supplemented with sodium lactate (20 mM). The pH was adjusted with 2 M HCl or 1 M Na2CO3. In the NaCl tolerance tests, various amounts of NaCl (0–50 g l–1) were added to basal medium or NaCl-free medium with reduced MgCl2 . 6H2O (0.4 g l–1). Utilization of electron donors was tested in small screw-capped tubes filled with basal medium, except in the case of H2, and was evaluated by monitoring the growth (i.e. the optical density of the culture) for longer than 1 month and by the production of hydrogen sulfide, detected by cupric reagent (Widdel & Bak, 1992). To test for H2 utilization, the gas phase was filled with H2/CO2 (80 : 20, v/v) in small tubes closed with butyl rubber stoppers and screw caps. Fermentation was tested with basal medium modified such that it lacked any electron acceptors and contained dithionite (final concentration, 40 mg l–1) instead of sodium sulfide. Thiosulfate (20 mM), sulfite (5 mM), elemental sulfur (1 %), nitrate (10 mM), acrylate [20 mM with yeast extract (1 g l–1)] and 2,4,6-tribromophenol [100 and 200 µM with yeast extract (1 g l–1)] were tested as sole electron acceptors in the modified basal medium containing lactate (20 mM) as electron donor. Formate was used as an electron donor with acetate (2 mM) and yeast extract (0.5 g l–1) to test for the utilization of fumarate (20 mM) as an electron acceptor. To test for disproportionation, modified basal medium (containing 20 mM thiosulfate and 2 mM acetate) was used.
The optical densities of liquid cultures were measured by inserting the screw-capped culture tubes directly into a photometer (Tokyo Photoelectric). For the analysis of end products, a 40 ml sample of the modified basal medium in 70 ml serum vials was used. The gas phase was N2. Fatty acids were analysed by means of HPLC (Purdy et al., 1997) and GC (Takii et al., 2007). Hydrogen in the gas phase was analysed by using GC as described previously (Takii et al., 2007). Desulfoviridin was tested as described by Postgate (1959). Cytochromes were identified by redox-spectroscopy (dithionite reduced minus ferricyanide oxidized) of cell-free extracts at 540–570 nm using a UV-3000 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu). Catalase was detected by pouring a 3 % H2O2 solution onto a cell pellet in a centrifugation tube. Respiratory quinones were extracted with chloroform/methanol (2 : 1, v/v), purified with a Sep-Pak Plus column (Waters) and analysed by using a reversed-phase HPLC system (Beckman System Gold with a Hewlett Packard Zorbox ODS column) as described by Shintani et al. (2000).
The DNA G+C content was measured at the Techno Suruga Co. Ltd (Shizuoka, Japan), using HPLC as described by Katayama-Fujimura et al. (1984).
16S rRNA gene fragments were amplified by means of a PCR using a MicroSeq 500 16S rDNA gene Bacterial Identification PCR kit (Applied Biosystems) and sequenced with a MicroSeq 500 16S rDNA gene Bacterial Identification sequencing kit on a gene analyser system (ABI PRISM 3100; Applied Biosystems) at the Techno Suruga Co., Ltd. The dissimilatory sulfite reductase (DSR) gene of strain C/L2T was amplified with primers DSR1F and DSR4R (Wagner et al., 1998). The DSR amplification products were directly sequenced using primers DSR1F and DSR4R and the internal primer DSR1Fl (Dhillon et al., 2003) on a DNA sequencer (ABI 377; Applied Biosystems). The 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained and the deduced amino acid sequences of the α- and β-subunits of the DSR gene were aligned and compared with reference sequences by using the ARB program package (Ludwig et al., 2004) and CLUSTAL W, version 1.6 (Thompson et al., 1994), respectively. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining method (Saitou & Nei, 1987) with the ARB program package or the MEGA2 program (Kumar et al., 2001). Bootstrap analysis based on 1000 replicates was performed (Felsenstein, 1985).
DNA–DNA hybridization was performed by the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (Braunschweig, Germany). DNA was isolated from bacterial cells by using chromatography on hydroxyapatite according to the procedure of Cashion et al. (1977). DNA–DNA hybridization was carried out as described by De Ley et al. (1970) with the modifications reported by Huß et al. (1983), using a Cary 100 Bio UV/VIS spectrophotometer equipped with a Peltier-thermostatted 6x6 multicell changer and a temperature controller with an in situ temperature probe (Varian).
The sediment sample collected from the inner part of Tokyo Bay (14 ° 00' 2'' E 3 ° 37' 19'' N) was inoculated into basal medium supplemented with Casamino acids (3.5 g l–1) as a carbon and energy source. A stable sulfate-reducing enrichment culture was successfully established. After further enrichment with lactate, strain C/L2T was isolated by repeated agar shake culture.
The purity of the strain was confirmed by the morphological homogeneity of cells grown on various substrates under a phase-contrast microscope and by the identical partial sequences of the 16S rRNA gene obtained from several colonies in the agar shake culture.
The cells of strain C/L2T were vibrio-shaped (0.7–1.0 µm wide and 1.0–3.5 µm long) and were motile, by means of single polar flagella, in the exponential growth phase (see Supplementary Fig. S1 available in IJSEM Online). Most cells rapidly changed to short rods and cocci (less than 1 µm wide), showing no motility after the exponential phase when cultivated with lactate, pyruvate or Casamino acids. However, this morphological change was delayed when cells were cultivated with fumarate or succinate. No sporulation was observed. Cells stained Gram-negative and behaved like Gram-negative cells in the KOH lysis test.
The optimum growth temperature for strain C/L2T on lactate and sulfate was 37 °C. No growth was observed at 10 or 42 °C. The strain grew between pH 6.3 and 8.6, with an optimum around pH 7.5. The NaCl concentration for growth was 0.5–35 g l–1, the optimal concentration being 20–25 g l–1.
The isolate showed anaerobic growth by sulfate reduction using various organic substrates as electron donor, i.e. lactate, pyruvate, fumarate, malate, succinate, ethanol, propanol, glycerol (each at 20 mM), glycine, alanine, serine, aspartate (each at 10 mM), Casamino acids (3.5 g l–1), peptone (5 g l–1) or yeast extract (1 g l–1). When Casamino acids were added as a substrate (3.5 g l–1), only four amino acids (serine, alanine, threonine and glycine) had been almost completely utilized after 5 days incubation (Takii et al., 2007). Vitamins were not required for growth on lactate and sulfate, because the cultures could be transferred (1 % inoculation size) to the vitamin-free medium at least three times. However, the addition of yeast extract (1 g l–1) increased cell yield as much as twofold. Growth on hydrogen or formate required the presence of yeast extract (0.5 g l–1) in addition to acetate as a carbon source. Lactate (19.9 mM) was oxidized in the presence of sulfate to acetate (18.6 mM), CO2 and H2S. Pyruvate, fumarate, Casamino acids, peptone and yeast extract were fermented in the absence of sulfate but not lactate. The fermentation products from pyruvate (10.7 mM) were acetate (8.2 mM), succinate (0.9 mM), H2 and CO2. Fumarate (10.4 mM) was converted to acetate (7.7 mM), succinate (4.8 mM), H2 and CO2 in the sulfate-free medium. Fermentative growth on pyruvate and fumarate was weak. A Stickland reaction was not observed with alanine–glycine or alanine–proline. Disproportionation of thiosulfate was not observed. Sulfate, thiosulfate and sulfite served as electron acceptors in the presence of lactate as the energy and carbon source, but this was not the case with elemental sulfur, nitrate, fumarate, acrylate or 2,4,6-tribromophenol.
Cytochromes of the c type were present in the soluble and membrane fractions of strain C/L2T, as revealed by the absorption maximum at 550 nm in the redox-differential spectrum. Desulfoviridin was present. Catalase was produced. The major respiratory quinone was MK-6(H2). The G+C content of the genomic DNA was 46.2 mol%.
Phylogenetic analysis of an almost full-length 16S rRNA gene sequence (1533 bp) from strain C/L2T showed that the strain fell within the genus Desulfovibrio, family Desulfovibrionaceae, order Desulfovibriales, in the Deltaproteobacteria (Fig. 1). Its closest relative was the uncharacterized Desulfovibrio sp. strain TBP-1 (sequence similarity of 99.4 %; Boyle et al., 1999) and the closest species with a validly published name was Desulfovibrio acrylicus DSM 10141T (98.7 %; van der Maarel et al., 1996). These two were coherently clustered with strain C/L2T. Analysis of the approximately 600-amino-acid sequence of the gene for DSR (an enzyme essential to sulfate reduction) also revealed that strain C/L2T was robustly associated with the genus Desulfovibrio (see Supplementary Fig. S2 available in IJSEM Online).
|
Strain C/L2T was similar to members of the genus Desulfovibrio (belonging to the Deltaproteobacteria) in the following physiological and chemotaxonomic respects: H2, lactate, pyruvate, ethanol, fumarate and malate were each used as an electron donor in the presence of sulfate; growth in the absence of an electron acceptor was possible from the fermentation of pyruvate or fumarate; desulfoviridin was present; and MK-6(H2) was the major menaquinone (Widdel & Bak, 1992). The phenotypic similarities were also supported by results of sequence comparisons based on 16S rRNA and dsrAB genes.
Table 1 shows the characteristics that serve to differentiate between strain C/L2T and closely related species. Strain C/L2T differs from Desulfovibrio acrylicus in being unable to utilize acrylate as an electron acceptor; Desulfovibrio acrylicus was so named because of its unique ability to decompose acrylate. Unlike Desulfovibrio acrylicus, strain C/L2T possessed catalase and was able to utilize sulfite as an electron acceptor and to oxidize aspartate. Strain C/L2T was unable to oxidize cysteine, unlike Desulfovibrio acrylicus, which could use this substrate. In spite of the high level of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (98.7 %) between strain C/L2T and Desulfovibrio acrylicus DSM 10141T, DNA–DNA hybridization revealed only 10.3 % relatedness. As the recommended threshold value for DNA–DNA relatedness for the definition of species is 70 % (Wayne et al., 1987), this result confirmed that the two strains are not related at species level. The high level of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (99.4 %) between strain C/L2T and the uncharacterized strain TBP-1 indicated that they are closely related to each other phylogenetically. However, there were clear differences between strains C/L2T and TBP-1 in the usage of electron acceptors and in the tolerance of salt: TBP-1 was able to reduce elemental sulfur and 2,4,6-tribromophenol, unlike the novel isolate, and strain TBP-1 was able to grow with NaCl at concentrations up to 75 g l–1 (optimally at 37.5 g l–1) whereas strain C/L2T did not show significant growth at NaCl concentrations above 35 g l–1. Unfortunately, strain TBP-1 is not available at the moment, so further phenotypic comparisons and DNA–DNA hybridization experiments are not possible.
Table 1. Characteristics used for distinguishing strain C/L2T (Desulfovibrio marinisediminis sp. nov.) from related species of the genus Desulfovibrio Taxa: 1, strain C/L2T (data from this study); 2, Desulfovibrio species TBP-1 (Boyle et al.,1999); 3, Desulfovibrio acrylicus (van der Maarel et al., 1996). All taxa listed reduce sulfate and thiosulfate to sulfide, but do not reduce ritrate. All use hydrogen, formate, fumarate, lactate and pyruvate as electron donors, but not acetate, propionate or buty-rate as electron donors. All taxa have desulfoviridin. +, Used or present; –, not used or absent; ND, not described.
Although strain C/L2T showed only a limited ability to utilize amino acids, the metabolism of amino acids was extensively enhanced in co-culture of the strain with Dethiosulfatibacter aminovorans, an amino acid-fermenting bacterium isolated from the same enrichment culture (Takii et al., 2007). This stimulation was due to the scavenging of H2 by strain C/L2T (confirmed by the absence of H2 in the co-culture). Recently, Haouari et al. (2006) isolated Desulfovibrio species closely related (>99 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity) to strain TBP-1 from Tunisian marine sediments, by using peptone as substrate. Like strain C/L2T, these strains might also contribute to amino acid decomposition as hydrogen scavengers in marine environments.
On the basis of its phylogenetic and phenotypic properties, it is proposed that strain C/L2T represents a novel species in the genus Desulfovibrio, for which the name Desulfovibrio marinisediminis sp. nov. is proposed.
Description of Desulfovibrio marinisediminis sp. nov.
Desulfovibrio marinisediminis (ma.ri.ni.sed'i.mi'nis. L. adj. marinus of the sea, marine; L. gen. n. sediminis of a sediment; N.L. gen. n. marinisediminis of a marine sediment).
Vibrioid cells (0.7–1.0 µm wide and 1.0–3.5 µm long) rapidly change to a coccoid form after the exponential phase of growth. Gram-negative. Cells are motile by means of single polar flagella. Mesophilic. Optimum growth occurs at 37 °C and at a pH around 7.5. Grows with NaCl at 0.5–35 g l–1 (optimally at 20–25 g l–1). Strictly anaerobic. Able to use sulfate, sulfite and thiosulfate as electron acceptors, with the production of sulfide, but unable to use elemental sulfur, nitrate, fumarate, acrylate or 2,4,6-tribromophenol. Does not show disproportionation of thiosulfate. Hydrogen, formate, lactate, pyruvate, fumarate, malate, succinate, ethanol, propanol, glycerol, glycine, alanine, serine, aspartate, Casamino acids, peptone and yeast extract are used as electron donors. Pyruvate, fumarate, Casamino acids, peptone and yeast extract can be utilized fermentatively. Acetate, propionate, butyrate, benzoate, butanol, valine, leucine, isoleucine, proline, methionine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, threonine, cysteine, asparagine, glutamine, glutamate, histidine, lysine, arginine, gelatin and sugars (glucose, mannose, fructose, maltose and sucrose) are not used as sole substrates for growth. Desulfoviridin, c-type cytochromes and catalase are present. The G+C content of the genomic DNA of the type strain is 46.2 mol%.
The type strain, C/L2T (=NMRC 101113T=JCM 14577T=DSM 17456T), was isolated from a Casamino acid-containing enrichment culture inoculated with anoxic sediment collected from a highly eutrophic area of Tokyo Bay, Japan.
References
Boyle, A. W., Phelps, C. D. & Young, L. Y. (1999). Isolation from estuarine sediments of a Desulfovibrio strain which can grow on lactate coupled to the reductive dehalogenation of 2,4,6-tribromophenol. Appl Environ Microbiol 65, 1133–1140.
Burdige, D. (1989). The effects of sediment slurrying on microbial processes, and the role of amino acids as substrates for sulfate reduction in anoxic marine sediments. Biogeochemistry 8, 1–23.
Burdige, D. (1991). Microbial processes affecting alanine and glutamic acid in anoxic marine sediments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 85, 211–232.[CrossRef]
Cashion, P., Holder-Franklin, M. A., McCully, J. & Franklin, M. (1977). A rapid method for base ratio determination of bacterial DNA. Anal Biochem 81, 461–466.[CrossRef][Medline]
Christensen, D. (1984). Determination of substrates oxidized by sulfate reduction in intact cores of marine sediments. Limnol Oceanogr 29, 189–192.
De Ley, J., Cattoir, H. & Reynaerts, A. (1970). The quantitative measurement of DNA hybridization from renaturation of bacterial DNA. Eur J Biochem 12, 133–142.[Medline]
Dhillon, A., Teske, A., Dillon, J., Stahl, D. A. & Sogin, M. L. (2003). Molecular characterization of sulfate-reducing bacteria in the Guaymas Basin. Appl Environ Microbiol 69, 2765–2772.
Doetsch, R. N. (1981). Determinative methods of light microscopy. In Manual of Methods for General Bacteriology, pp. 21–33. Edited by P. Gerhardt, R. G. E. Murray, R. N. Costilow, E. W. Nester, W. A. Wood, N. R. Krieg & G. B. Phillips. Washington DC: American Society of Microbiology.
Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791.[CrossRef]
Finster, K., Thomsen, T. R. & Ramsing, N. B. (2001). Desulfomusa hansenii gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel marine propionate-degrading, sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from Zostera marina root. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51, 2055–2061.[Abstract]
Fukui, M., Suh, J., Yonezawa, Y. & Urushigawa, Y. (1997). Major substrates for microbial sulfate reduction in the sediments of Ise Bay, Japan. Ecol Res 12, 201–209.[CrossRef]
Gregersen, T. (1978). Rapid method for distinction of Gram-negative from Gram-positive bacteria. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 5, 123–127.[CrossRef]
Hansen, L. S. & Blackburn, T. H. (1995). Amino acid degradation by sulfate-reducing bacteria: evaluation of four methods. Limnol Oceanogr 40, 502–510.
Hansen, L. S., Holmer, M. & Blackburn, T. H. (1993). Mineralization of organic nitrogen and carbon (fish food) added to anoxic sediment microcosms: role of sulphate reduction. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 102, 199–204.[CrossRef]
Haouari, O., Fardeau, M.-L., Casalot, L., Tholozan, J.-L., Hamdi, M. & Olliver, B. (2006). Isolation of sulfate-reducing bacteria from Tunisian marine sediments and description of Desulfovibrio bizertensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56, 2909–2913.
Huß, V. A. R., Festl, H. & Schleifer, K. H. (1983). Studies on the spectrophotometric determination of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates. Syst Appl Microbiol 4, 184–192.
Jørgensen, B. B. (1982). Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed – the role of sulphate reduction. Nature 296, 643–645.[CrossRef]
Katayama-Fujimura, Y., Komatsu, Y., Kuraishi, H. & Kaneko, T. (1984). Estimation of DNA base composition by high performance liquid chromatography of its nuclease P1 hydrolysate. Agric Biol Chem 48, 3169–3172.
Kumar, S., Tamura, K., Jakobsen, I. B. & Nei, M. (2001). MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics 17, 1244–1245.
Ludwig, W., Strunk, O., Westram, R., Richter, L., Meier, H., Yadhukumar, Buchner, A., Lai, T., Steppi, S. & other authors (2004). ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 32, 1363–1371.
Parkes, R. J., Gibson, G. R., Mueller-Harvey, I., Buckingham, W. J. & Herbert, R. J. (1989). Determination of the substrates for sulphate-reducing bacteria within marine and estuarine sediments with different rates of sulphate reduction. J Gen Microbiol 135, 175–187.
Postgate, J. (1959). A diagnostic reaction of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Nature 183, 481–482.
Purdy, K. J., Nedwell, D. B., Embley, T. M. & Takii, S. (1997). Use of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes to investigate the occurrence and selection of sulfate-reducing bacteria in response to nutrient addition to sediment slurry microcosms from a Japanese estuary. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 24, 221–234.[CrossRef]
Rees, G. N., Harfoot, C. G. & Sheehy, A. J. (1998). Amino acid degradation by the mesophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfobacterium vacuolatum. Arch Microbiol 169, 76–80.[CrossRef][Medline]
Saitou, N. & Nei, M. (1987). The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4, 406–425.[Abstract]
Sass, A., Rutters, H., Cypionka, H. & Sass, H. (2002). Desulfobulbus mediterraneus sp. nov., a sulfate-reducing bacterium growing on mono- and disaccharides. Arch Microbiol 177, 468–474.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shintani, T., Liu, W.-T., Hanada, S., Kamagata, Y., Miyaoka, S., Suzuki, T. & Nakamura, K. (2000). Micropruina glycogenisa gen. nov., sp. nov., a new Gram-positive glycogen-accumulating bacterium isolated from activated sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50, 201–207.[Abstract]
Sørensen, J., Christensen, D. & Jørgensen, B. B. (1981). Volatile fatty acids and hydrogen as substrates for sulfate-reducing bacteria in anaerobic marine sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol 42, 5–11.
Stams, A. J. M. & Hansen, T. A. (1986). Metabolism of L-alanine in Desulfotomaculum ruminis and two marine Desulfovibrio strains. Arch Microbiol 145, 277–279.[CrossRef]
Stams, A. J. M., Hansen, T. A. & Skyring, G. W. (1985). Utilization of amino acids as energy substrates by two marine Desulfovibrio strains. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 31, 11–15.[CrossRef]
Takii, S. (2003). Amino acids as main substrates for sulfate-reducing bacteria in surface sediment of a eutrophic bay. J Gen Appl Microbiol 49, 329–336.[CrossRef][Medline]
Takii, S., Tanaka, H., Kohata, K., Nakamura, Y., Ogura, H. & Takeshita, S. (2002). Seasonal changes in sulfate reduction in sediments in the inner part of Tokyo Bay. Microbes Environ 17, 10–17.[CrossRef]
Takii, S., Hanada, S., Tamaki, H., Ueno, Y., Sekiguchi, Y., Ibe, A. & Matsuura, K. (2007). Dethiosulfatibacter aminovorans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel thiosulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from coastal marine sediment via sulfate-reducing enrichment with Casamino acids. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57, 2320–2326.
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. (1994). CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22, 4673–4680.
van der Maarel, M., van Bergeijk, S., van Werkhoven, A. F., Laverman, A. M., Meijer, W. G., Stam, W. T. & Hansen, T. A. (1996). Cleavage of dimethylsulfoniopropionate and reduction of acrylate by Desulfovibrio acrylicus sp. nov. Arch Microbiol 166, 109–115.[CrossRef]
Wagner, M., Roger, A. J., Flax, J. L., Brusseau, G. A. & Stahl, D. R. (1998). Phylogeny of dissimilatory sulfate reductases supports an early origin of sulfate respiration. J Bacteriol 180, 2975–2982.
Wayne, L. G., Brenner, D. J., Colwell, R. R., Grimont, P. A. D., Kandler, O., Krichevsky, M. I., Moore, L. H., Moore, W. E. C., Murray, R. G. E. & other authors (1987). International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37, 463–464.
Widdel, F. & Bak, F. (1992). Gram-negative mesotrophic sulfate-reducing bacteria. In The Prokaryotes, 2nd edn, vol. 4, pp. 3352–3378. Edited by A. Balows, H. G. Trüper, M. Dworkin, W. Harder & K.-H. Schleifer. New York: Springer.
Winfrey, M. R. & Ward, D. M. (1983). Substrates for sulfate reduction and methane production in intertidal sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 45, 193–199.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |