Summary auto-generated
Researchers evaluated a dipstrip method (Bacteruritest) for quantifying bacteria in endotracheal aspirates from 42 ventilated patients, comparing results with conventional surface plate counting. The dipstrip technique uses filter paper strips of standard porosity that absorb a known fluid volume and deposit it onto agar plates. Of 33 specimens yielding quantifiable counts, 31 showed results within a 10-fold range of surface plate counts, with two additional specimens within a 100-fold range. Six specimens produced confluent growth in both methods, and three showed no detectable growth by dipstrip but low counts by surface plate method. The dipstrip method accurately quantified bacterial loads from 10³ to >10¹¹ cfu/ml. The authors conclude that dipstrips provide a practical, cost-effective alternative to labor-intensive serial dilution methods for routine bacterial quantification in endotracheal aspirates. Each dipstrip costs approximately 0.5 pence compared to 30 pence per blood agar plate, and multiple imprints can be applied to single plates, potentially enabling routine quantification of bacterial loads in respiratory specimens.
Key findings
- Dipstrip method yielded bacterial counts within a 10-fold range of surface plate counts in 31 of 33 evaluable specimens
- Dipstrips accurately quantified bacterial loads in the range of 10³ to >10¹¹ cfu/ml, encompassing clinically relevant diagnostic thresholds
- Dipstrip method is significantly more cost-effective (0.5 pence per strip versus 30 pence per agar plate) and less labor-intensive than conventional serial dilution techniques
- Three proposed dilutions (2-fold, 10², and 10⁴) would allow quantitative estimation of endotracheal aspirate loads between 10⁴-10¹⁰ cfu/ml
This summary was generated automatically from the article PDF and is not part of the original publication. Refer to the PDF for the authoritative text.
Abstract
A convenient dipstrip method (Bacteruritest; Mast Diagnostics) for bacterial quantification was evaluated with 42 endotracheal aspirates. For 31 specimens, the dipstrip method yielded counts within a 10-fold range of surface plate counts. Two specimens yielded counts by the dipstrip within a 100-fold range of plate counts. Six specimens yielded confluent growth at the greatest dilution tested by the dipstrip method, and counts > 10(10) cfu/ml in the surface plate method. Three specimens yielded no detectable growth by the dipstrip and surface plate counts < 10(2) cfu/ml. Dipstrips provide a cheap, convenient method for the routine quantification of the bacterial load in endotracheal aspirates.