Abstract
For the LC PCR targeting the T. gondii B1 gene (Costa et al., 2000) primers B1 sense (5'-GGAGGACTGGCAACCTGGTGTCG-3') and B1 antisense (5'-TTGTTTCACCCGGACCGTTTAGCAG-3') and probes Tox1 (5'-CGGAAATAGAAAGCCATGAGGCACTCCfluorescein-3') and Tox2 (5'-Red 640ACGGGCGAGTAGCACCTGAGGAGATPh-3') were used. The reaction mixture (20 µl; Master Hybridization Probes kit; Roche Diagnostics) contained 0.5 µM of each primer, 0.2 µM of each probe, 5 mM MgCl2 and 5 µl extracted DNA. Amplification was performed in a LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics) for 50 cycles: 5 s denaturation at 95 °C, 10 s annealing at 60 °C and 15 s extension at 72 °C, with an overall ramp rate of 20 °C s1. For the LC PCR targeting the T. gondii 529 bp repeat region (Reischl et al., 2003) primers Tox9 (5'-AGGAGAGATATCAGGACTGTAG-3') and 10as (5'-GCGTCGTCTCGTCTGGATCG-3') and probes Tox3 (5'-GAGTCGGAGAGGGAGAAGATGTTfluorescein-3') and Tox4 (5'-Red 640CCGGCTTGGCTGCTTTTCCTGPh-3') were used. The reaction mixture (20 µl) contained 0.5 µM of each primer, 0.2 µM each probe, 3 mM MgCl2 and 5 µl extracted DNA. Amplification was performed for 50 cycles: 10 s denaturation at 95 °C, 20 s annealing at 50 °C and 30 s extension at 72 °C, with an overall ramp rate of 20 °C s1.
To evaluate the sensitivity of the conventional nested PCR assay, the PCR product of a sample containing T. gondii DNA was sequenced and cloned into a plasmid vector (TOPO TA cloning kit; Invitrogen). Toxoplasma-free EDTA blood was spiked with the plasmid. Anti-toxoplasma antibodies were detected in serum by immunosorbent agglutination assay (ISAGA; Toxo Multi Tool; Innogenetics), immunofluorescence test (IFT; Toxo-Spot IF; bioMérieux) and ELISA (IgG/IgM kit; VirionSerion).
All PCR assays were performed according to quality standards for nucleic acid amplification techniques published by the German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology (Roth et al., 2001). This included physical separation of working areas for the preparation of amplification reaction mixtures, for specimen preparation, for preparation of positive controls and for the amplification and detection of nucleic acids. In all rooms the equipment was labelled to indicate clearly the working area to which it belonged. Only plugged pipette tips were used to prevent contamination by aerosols. All areas were equipped with flow benches. Moreover, the risk of contamination was reduced by a unidirectional workflow ensuring that pre- and post-amplification procedures were not performed alternately. To inactivate nucleic acids, working surfaces were cleaned with sodium hypochlorite solutions and flow benches were irradiated with UV light. The following controls were performed in each run. As a negative control for specimen processing, DNA was extracted from a sample that did not contain the target sequence and the DNA extract was subjected to amplification and detection. As a negative control for amplification, reaction mixtures containing reagents only, but not nucleic acids, were amplified (in the case of the nested PCR, in both rounds). As a positive control for extraction and amplification, DNA of a sample containing the target sequence in low copy number was extracted and amplified. Finally, as a control for inhibition, a fragment of the human ß-actin gene was amplified in each sample. Samples with discrepant results in the three PCR assays were analysed in duplicate.
For the LC PCR targeting the T. gondii B1 gene (Costa et al., 2000) primers B1 sense (5'-GGAGGACTGGCAACCTGGTGTCG-3') and B1 antisense (5'-TTGTTTCACCCGGACCGTTTAGCAG-3') and probes Tox1 (5'-CGGAAATAGAAAGCCATGAGGCACTCCfluorescein-3') and Tox2 (5'-Red 640ACGGGCGAGTAGCACCTGAGGAGATPh-3') were used. The reaction mixture (20 µl; Master Hybridization Probes kit; Roche Diagnostics) contained 0.5 µM of each primer, 0.2 µM of each probe, 5 mM MgCl2 and 5 µl extracted DNA. Amplification was performed in a LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics) for 50 cycles: 5 s denaturation at 95 °C, 10 s annealing at 60 °C and 15 s extension at 72 °C, with an overall ramp rate of 20 °C s1. For the LC PCR targeting the T. gondii 529 bp repeat region (Reischl et al., 2003) primers Tox9 (5'-AGGAGAGATATCAGGACTGTAG-3') and 10as (5'-GCGTCGTCTCGTCTGGATCG-3') and probes Tox3 (5'-GAGTCGGAGAGGGAGAAGATGTTfluorescein-3') and Tox4 (5'-Red 640CCGGCTTGGCTGCTTTTCCTGPh-3') were used. The reaction mixture (20 µl) contained 0.5 µM of each primer, 0.2 µM each probe, 3 mM MgCl2 and 5 µl extracted DNA. Amplification was performed for 50 cycles: 10 s denaturation at 95 °C, 20 s annealing at 50 °C and 30 s extension at 72 °C, with an overall ramp rate of 20 °C s1.
To evaluate the sensitivity of the conventional nested PCR assay, the PCR product of a sample containing T. gondii DNA was sequenced and cloned into a plasmid vector (TOPO TA cloning kit; Invitrogen). Toxoplasma-free EDTA blood was spiked with the plasmid. Anti-toxoplasma antibodies were detected in serum by immunosorbent agglutination assay (ISAGA; Toxo Multi Tool; Innogenetics), immunofluorescence test (IFT; Toxo-Spot IF; bioMérieux) and ELISA (IgG/IgM kit; VirionSerion).
All PCR assays were performed according to quality standards for nucleic acid amplification techniques published by the German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology (Roth et al., 2001). This included physical separation of working areas for the preparation of amplification reaction mixtures, for specimen preparation, for preparation of positive controls and for the amplification and detection of nucleic acids. In all rooms the equipment was labelled to indicate clearly the working area to which it belonged. Only plugged pipette tips were used to prevent contamination by aerosols. All areas were equipped with flow benches. Moreover, the risk of contamination was reduced by a unidirectional workflow ensuring that pre- and post-amplification procedures were not performed alternately. To inactivate nucleic acids, working surfaces were cleaned with sodium hypochlorite solutions and flow benches were irradiated with UV light. The following controls were performed in each run. As a negative control for specimen processing, DNA was extracted from a sample that did not contain the target sequence and the DNA extract was subjected to amplification and detection. As a negative control for amplification, reaction mixtures containing reagents only, but not nucleic acids, were amplified (in the case of the nested PCR, in both rounds). As a positive control for extraction and amplification, DNA of a sample containing the target sequence in low copy number was extracted and amplified. Finally, as a control for inhibition, a fragment of the human ß-actin gene was amplified in each sample. Samples with discrepant results in the three PCR assays were analysed in duplicate.
Over the 18-month study, 16 samples obtained from eight allogenic transplant recipients were shown to contain T. gondii DNA by the nested PCR protocol (Table 1). Twelve of these samples yielded a positive result following amplification with each of the three PCR protocols. The remaining four samples were negative in at least one of the real-time PCRs. PCR products from two discordant samples were sequenced, which confirmed the accuracy of the conventional PCR. PCR inhibitors were not detected when a fragment of the human ß-actin gene was amplified (Murray et al., 1990). To investigate the analytical sensitivity of the nested PCR assay, toxoplasma-free EDTA blood was spiked with a plasmid containing the PCR positive control at different concentrations (107 to 100 copies ml1). DNA was extracted and amplified. Amplicon analysis (190 bp) on an agarose gel indicated a sensitivity of the nested PCR in the range of 110 copies (ml blood)1. Amplification of DNA from a diluted T. gondii-positive blood sample using each of the three PCR assays indicated similar sensitivities of the three assays (data not shown). Over the entire study, 1000 routine DNA extracts were amplified using the nested PCR, in which no non-specific amplicons were detected. Amplification of DNA extracted from 20 randomly selected routine EDTA-blood samples using either of the two LC assays did not generate a fluorescence signal. Amplification and detection of the amplicon was completed within 1 h using the real-time PCR assays, compared to 3.5 h using the conventional nested PCR plus subsequent gel electrophoretic detection of the amplicon. The clinical data of three patients whose specimens showed discrepant PCR results are summarized in Table 2.Table 1. Detection of T. gondii DNA in patient samples with real-time and conventional nested PCR assays +, Positive; , negative; BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid.
Table 2. Clinical data of allogenic stem cell recipients with T. gondii-positive samples AML, Acute myeloid leukaemia; ALL, acute lymphoid leukaemia; JMML, juvenile myelomonocytic leukaemia; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; CT, computerized tomography.
Our observation that the LC assays failed to detect T. gondii DNA in some specimens confirms the results of a recent study on the performance of LC technology in human samples (Teo et al., 2002). Several parameters were identified to have an adverse effect in the LC assays, including abstraction of PCR reagents on glass capillaries, primer-dimer formation and non-specific product generation (Teo et al., 2002). Also, the amount of human chromosomal DNA in the specimen was shown to influence the amplification efficiency of the target DNA. In our study, the LC assay targeting the T. gondii 529 bp repeat region (200300 copies per parasite) (Homan et al., 2000) revealed false-negative results in only two samples, whereas the LC assay targeting the T. gondii B1 gene (35 copies per parasite) (Burg et al., 1989) revealed false-negative results in four samples. Therefore, it appears likely that the discrepancies in PCR results are partly caused by different copy numbers of the target sequences. This is in agreement with a recent study on T. gondii-positive amniotic fluids, which showed that amplification of a sequence within the T. gondii 529 bp repeat region is at least 10 times more sensitive than targeting the T. gondii B1 gene (Reischl et al., 2003). The three patients for whom the conventional PCR and the LC assays gave discrepant results had non-specific symptoms compatible with toxoplasma reactivation.
In conclusion, real-time PCR allows rapid identification of T. gondii DNA in patient samples. However, discrepancies between real-time PCR and conventional nested PCR results occur in a minority of routine samples. Therefore, real-time and conventional PCR protocols for T. gondii should be optimized and carefully evaluated in patient samples before they are implemented as routine methods.
We thank C. Klotz and S. Richt for excellent technical assistance.References
- Burg, J. L., Grover, C. M., Pouletty, P. & Boothroyd, J. C. (1989). Direct and sensitive detection of a pathogenic protozoan, Toxoplasma gondii, by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 27, 17871792.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Costa, J. M., Pautas, C., Ernault, P., Foulet, F., Cordonnier, C. & Bretagne, S. (2000). Real-time PCR for diagnosis and follow-up of toxoplasma reactivation after allogeneic stem cell transplantation using fluorescence resonance energy transfer hybridization probes. J Clin Microbiol 38, 29292932.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Homan, W. L., Vercammen, M., De Braekeleer, J. & Verschueren, H. (2000). Identification of a 200- to 300-fold repetitive 529 bp DNA fragment in Toxoplasma gondii, and its use for diagnostic and quantitative PCR. Int J Parasitol 30, 6975.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Mele, A., Paterson, P. J., Prentice, H. G., Leoni, P. & Kibbler, C. C. (2002). Toxoplasmosis in bone marrow transplantation: a report of two cases and systematic review of the literature. Bone Marrow Transplant 29, 691698.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Murray, L. J., Lee, R. & Martens, C. (1990). In vivo cytokine gene expression in T cell subsets of the autoimmune MRL/Mp-lpr/lpr mouse. Eur J Immunol 20, 163170.[Medline]
- Reischl, U., Bretagne, S., Krüger, D., Ernault, P. & Costa, J. M. (2003). Comparison of two DNA targets for the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis by real-time PCR using fluorescence resonance energy transfer hybridization probes. BMC Infect Dis 3, 7. 7.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Roth, A., Roth, B., Hoffken, G., Steuber, S., Khalifa, K. I. & Janitschke, K. (1992). Application of the polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of pulmonary toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 11, 11771181.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Roth, A., Mauch, H. & Göbel, U. B. (2001). Quality standards for microbiological diagnostic techniques for infectious diseases. In Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques, pp.128. Munich: Urban & Fischer.
- Teo, I. A., Choi, J. W., Morlese, J., Taylor, G. & Shaunak, S. (2002). LightCycler qPCR optimisation for low copy number target DNA. J Immunol Methods 270, 119133.[CrossRef][Medline]