Abstract
The Bcc comprises 15 distinct species formerly known as genomovars of B. cepacia (Vanlaere et al., 2008). Of these, the majority of infections in CF are attributed to Burkholderia multivorans and Burkholderia cenocepacia in both the UK and the USA (Mahenthiralingam et al., 2008; Reik et al., 2005), although all genomovars have been recovered from CF patients (Ortega et al., 2005). Eradication of an established Bcc infection is rarely achieved owing to the high intrinsic resistance of the genus to antimicrobial agents (Coenye et al., 2001). Although preventative strategies are considered the principal approach for management of Bcc infections (Jones & Webb, 2003), combination therapy may be used, extending the spectrum of antimicrobial activity across multiple antibiotic classes (Bonacorsi et al., 1999).
Novel antimicrobial therapeutic agents are urgently required due to the threat of naturally resistant and antibiotic-resistant strains. Cationic antimicrobial peptides (CAMPs) have potential, as they show broad-range activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, viruses and some fungal species (Hancock & Lehrer, 1998). Importantly, these peptides do not present the same issue of resistance observed with conventional antibiotics (Zasloff, 2002) and often have good activity against several multidrug-resistant bacterial species (Giacometti et al., 2005a). There is also evidence that in vitro selection of CAMP-resistant mutants is difficult (Hancock & Lehrer, 1998).
CAMPs are short, amphipathic, positively charged peptides that occur naturally in a wide range of species as vital components of the innate immune system and are also implicated in the adaptive immune response. The effects of CAMPs include antimicrobial activity (Zasloff, 2002), mast-cell degranulation (Niyonsaba et al., 2002), anti-endotoxin activity (Bowdish et al., 2005) and enhanced pro-inflammatory responses (Lillard et al., 1999).
As previous reports have described B. cepacia as being resistant to the action of CAMPs (Denyer & Maillard, 2002; Scott et al., 1999), we aimed to determine the efficacy of a panel of antimicrobial peptides against B. cepacia from genomovars I–V.
The Bcc comprises 15 distinct species formerly known as genomovars of B. cepacia (Vanlaere et al., 2008). Of these, the majority of infections in CF are attributed to Burkholderia multivorans and Burkholderia cenocepacia in both the UK and the USA (Mahenthiralingam et al., 2008; Reik et al., 2005), although all genomovars have been recovered from CF patients (Ortega et al., 2005). Eradication of an established Bcc infection is rarely achieved owing to the high intrinsic resistance of the genus to antimicrobial agents (Coenye et al., 2001). Although preventative strategies are considered the principal approach for management of Bcc infections (Jones & Webb, 2003), combination therapy may be used, extending the spectrum of antimicrobial activity across multiple antibiotic classes (Bonacorsi et al., 1999).
Novel antimicrobial therapeutic agents are urgently required due to the threat of naturally resistant and antibiotic-resistant strains. Cationic antimicrobial peptides (CAMPs) have potential, as they show broad-range activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, viruses and some fungal species (Hancock & Lehrer, 1998). Importantly, these peptides do not present the same issue of resistance observed with conventional antibiotics (Zasloff, 2002) and often have good activity against several multidrug-resistant bacterial species (Giacometti et al., 2005a). There is also evidence that in vitro selection of CAMP-resistant mutants is difficult (Hancock & Lehrer, 1998).
CAMPs are short, amphipathic, positively charged peptides that occur naturally in a wide range of species as vital components of the innate immune system and are also implicated in the adaptive immune response. The effects of CAMPs include antimicrobial activity (Zasloff, 2002), mast-cell degranulation (Niyonsaba et al., 2002), anti-endotoxin activity (Bowdish et al., 2005) and enhanced pro-inflammatory responses (Lillard et al., 1999).
As previous reports have described B. cepacia as being resistant to the action of CAMPs (Denyer & Maillard, 2002; Scott et al., 1999), we aimed to determine the efficacy of a panel of antimicrobial peptides against B. cepacia from genomovars I–V.
Bacterial strains, growth conditions and media. The bacterial strains used in this study included 18 Bcc strains from genomovars I–V, which were originally provided by Professor John Govan (University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK) and obtained from the culture collection at the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK). Representative strains for each genomovar comprised B. cepacia J2540 (genomovar I), B. multivorans 7897 (genomovar II), B. cenocepacia J2956 (genomovar III), Burkholderia stabilis 7639 (genomovar IV) and Burkholderia vietnamiensis LMG 10929T (genomovar V). All strains were handled in Advisory Committee for Dangerous Pathogens (ADCP) II containment facilities and were maintained on Luria–Bertoni (LB) agar plates or broth.Antimicrobial agents. CAMPs were synthesized by Alta Biosciences (University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK). The peptides tested comprised calcitermin (Cole et al., 2001), cecropin A (Holak et al., 1988), a granulysin fragment (Linde et al., 2005), LL-37 (Agerberth et al., 1995; Niyonsaba et al., 2002), MUC7 (Bobek & Situ, 2003), P-113 (Giacometti et al., 2005b), ovine polyaspartic acid (Brogden et al., 1996) and magainin II (Giovannini et al., 1987; Zasloff, 1987). All of these are α-helical peptides, with the exception of ovine polyaspartic acid, which is too small to determine any secondary structure (6 aa). Stock solutions were prepared by reconstituting each peptide in sterile PBS containing 0.02 % acetic acid and 0.4 % BSA (Sigma-Aldrich).
In vitro assays for antimicrobial activity. The antimicrobial activity of each CAMP was determined relative to a control containing no peptide using a modified microtitre broth dilution method (Steinberg et al., 1997). Liquid bacterial cultures were grown to mid-exponential phase and diluted to 1x105 c.f.u. ml–1.
Antibacterial time–kill assays. Strains were grown to mid-exponential phase in LB broth at 37 °C. Aliquots of these cultures containing approximately 1x108 c.f.u. ml–1 were exposed separately to PBS (control) or 128 µg magainin II ml–1. Cultures were maintained at 37 °C with shaking (180 r.p.m.) throughout the assay. Samples were taken at 0, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 1440 min and then diluted serially in PBS and enumerated on LB agar. Viable counts (c.f.u. ml–1) were obtained after 18 h incubation at 37 °C.
Magainin II stability assay. Aliquots of magainin II were prepared at 256 µg ml–1 in LB broth and incubated at 37 °C for 0, 2, 5, 24 or 48 h prior to inoculation with a culture of B. cepacia J2540 grown to mid-exponential phase and containing approximately 1x108 c.f.u. ml–1. After inoculation, the concentration of magainin II in each sample was 128 µg ml–1; the control contained an equal volume of PBS. Samples were taken from the culture prior to inoculation into LB broth containing magainin II, and then at 30 min and at 1, 2, 3 and 4 h post-inoculation. These samples were serially diluted, plated onto LB agar and incubated at 37 °C for 18 h for viable counts. The decrease in c.f.u. ml–1 for each of the magainin II samples was compared with that produced by the freshly prepared peptide (0 h) to give an indication of the activity of magainin II following incubation over time, whilst a PBS control was used to measure normal B. cepacia growth over the 4 h period.
Effects of proteases on magainin II activity. B. cepacia J2450 was grown to late-stationary phase in LB broth at 37 °C to allow maximal expression of extracellular proteases. Culture supernatant was passed through 0.45 and 0.2 µm filters (Whatman International) to remove all bacteria. PBS (control), filtered culture supernatant or filtered culture supernatant+Complete (1 tablet in 50 ml supernatant inhibits serine, metallo- and cysteine proteases; Roche Diagnostics) was added to magainin II at 102 µg ml–1 and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. These pre-treated magainin II peptides were used in a standard time–kill assay, and samples were taken and enumerated at 0, 60, 240, 300, 360 and 1440 min. To visualize the susceptibility of magainin II to proteases, 500 µg magainin II ml–1 was incubated at 37 °C in supernatant from B. cepacia J2450 grown overnight in LB broth and filter-sterilized as above. Samples were removed at 0, 2, 5, 24 and 48 h and analysed by 4–20 % Tris/glycine SDS-PAGE (Invitrogen) before staining with Coomassie blue.
In vitro cell protection assay. Apoptotic cell death was measured by the activity of the cytoplasmic enzyme lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), which is released into the culture supernatant following damage to the cytoplasmic membrane and so is proportional to cell death. A LDHPLUS assay (Roche Diagnostics) was used to quantify the amount of LDH present and was performed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, BEAS-2B human bronchial epithelial cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10 % (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS; Sigma-Aldrich) at 37 °C with 5 % CO2. Cells were maintained as subconfluent monolayers, passaged by removal of the monolayer using DMEM culture medium and seeded into fresh polystyrene 96-well plates at 2x104 cells per well in a volume of 100 µl and incubated for 16 h. Cells were then incubated with magainin II across a concentration range of 25–200 µg ml–1 for 18 h at 37 °C with 5 % CO2. As a control to quantify maximal LDH release, cells were lysed with 1 % (v/v) Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. To quantify normal LDH release, cells were cultured and incubated with PBS. Spectrophotometric measurement of formazan dye at A450 was performed using a plate reader (EL800; BioTek Instruments). All tests were performed in triplicate with samples calculated as a percentage of the control (assuming 100 % cytotoxicity), giving an indication of the reduction of LDH release.
Statistical analysis of data. Two-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni's post-tests were carried out using Graphpad Prism version 4.0. P values ≤0.001 were considered significant.
Antimicrobial activity of peptides against Bcc strainsEight CAMPs were tested for inhibitory activity against 18 representative Bcc strains of genomovars I–V, and 50 and 90 % inhibitory concentration values (IC50 and IC90, respectively) were determined (Table 1). Subsequent experiments used the following strains as representative of each genomovar: B. cepacia J2540, genomovar I; B. multivorans 7897, genomovar II; B. cenocepacia J2956, genomovar III; B. stabilis 7639, genomovar IV; and B. vietnamiensis LMG 10929T, genomovar V. Polymyxin B was used as a control antibiotic to which widespread antimicrobial resistance has frequently been described in B. cepacia species. Calcitermin, cecropin A, granulysin, LL-37, MUC-7, P113 and poly-D-aspartic acid showed no growth inhibitory activity at concentrations up to 256 µg ml–1 towards any of the Bcc strains tested. However, magainin II exhibited variable growth inhibitory activity towards Bcc strains and within genomovars at concentrations of 128 and 256 µg ml–1, causing a reduction in the c.f.u. ml–1 of most strains when compared with controls. A possible exception was with genomovar V (B. vietnamiensis) where all strains exhibited IC50 values of ≥128 µg ml–1, suggesting marginally more magainin II resistance in this genomovar.
Table 1. IC values of magainin II against Bcc strains
Temporal effect of magainin II towards Bcc strains
In assays to evaluate the effect of magainin II over time, cultures of the five representative genomovar strains were incubated with 128 µg magainin II ml–1 and samples were collected at intervals between 0 and 1440 min. Fig. 1 shows that magainin II exerted strong antimicrobial activity against genomovars I (B. cepacia J2540) and V (B. vietnamiensis LMG 10929T). In each case, a reduction in c.f.u. ml–1 occurred within minutes of introducing the peptide to the culture at a concentration of 128 µg ml–1. Genomovar V was the most susceptible with complete killing after 10 min, whilst the count of genomovar I was reduced by 2 log10 within 5 min. After this initial decrease, magainin II appeared to exhibit a bacteriostatic effect, maintaining viable counts at approximately 1x106 c.f.u. ml–1. By contrast, exposure of B. multivorans 7897 (genomovar II), B. cenocepacia J2956 (genomovar III) and B. stabilis 7639 (genomovar IV) to 128 µg magainin II ml–1 did not result in an immediate decrease in bacterial number (data not shown). Instead, bacteriostatic activity towards these strains became evident at 40–120 min post-exposure, by which time growth of the control cultures had increased by almost 1 log10, whilst the cultures exposed to peptide remained relatively constant. At 180 min post-exposure to magainin II, genomovars II, III and IV were reduced by 35, 20 and 85 %, respectively, of the initial c.f.u. ml–1 of the culture. All cultures, with the exception of B. vietnamiensis LMG 10929T, exhibited regrowth to levels similar to that of controls after incubation at 37 °C for 24 h with magainin II. This regrowth at the 24 h time point may account for the apparently high IC50 values determined for some genomovars and may mask the initial antimicrobial activity; resumption of bacterial growth at 24 h may be due to degradation of the peptide. The IC50 values therefore possibly underestimated the activity of magainin, with cell-damaging effects being mediated at peptide concentrations lower than the IC50 concentrations.
|
Stability of magainin II
We hypothesized that the observed regrowth of bacteria after 24 h incubation with magainin II occurred because the peptide was unstable in solution, resulting in loss of antimicrobial activity. Thus 128 µg magainin II ml–1 was incubated in LB broth or bacterial culture supernatant for 0–48 h prior to exposure to B. cepacia J2540. Peptide activity was determined as a 2 log10 decrease in viable bacteria. These experiments showed that some antimicrobial activity towards B. cepacia J2540 was retained following incubation for up to 24 h in culture supernatant (Fig. 2). Although the activity was reduced compared with that of the freshly prepared peptide, magainin II incubated for 24 h in culture supernatant resulted in a 1 log decrease in viable bacteria compared with a 2 log decrease seen with freshly prepared magainin II. All antimicrobial activity was lost following incubation for 48 h in culture supernatant.
|
Effect of extracellular proteases on the antimicrobial activity of magainin II
Several reports have indicated that bacterial proteases can confer resistance to antimicrobial peptides (Guina et al., 2000; Park et al., 2001; Schmidtchen et al., 2002; Sieprawska-Lupa et al., 2004; Thwaite et al., 2006). To test whether this was true for Bcc strains, magainin II was incubated in the presence of filtered culture supernatant with and without a protease inhibitor for 30 min and then added to B. cepacia J2540 cells in broth. After incubation at 37 °C, the number of viable cells was determined at intervals up to 3 h. Initial studies confirmed that the protease inhibitor alone did not affect the growth of the test strain (data not shown). In the absence of magainin II, B. cepacia J2540 grew over the course of the experiment (Fig. 3), and in the presence of magainin II in PBS the number of viable bacterial cells decreased. The rate of decrease of viable cell numbers was slowed when magainin II was pre-incubated with culture supernatant, but pre-incubation of the peptide with culture supernatant containing protease inhibitors restored the killing activity of the peptide (P <0.0001). To confirm the degradation of magainin II by proteases, samples of the peptide incubated in B. cepacia J2540 culture supernatant for up to 48 h were analysed by SDS-PAGE. At 48 h, magainin II could no longer be visualized by Coomassie blue staining (Fig. 4), indicating its digestion by proteases present in the supernatant.
|
|
Magainin II decreases LDH release from BEAS-2B cells in response to B. cepacia infection
As previous reports have shown that magainin II has substantial anti-cancer properties (Ohsaki et al., 1992), the non-cancerous human bronchial epithelial cell line BEAS-2B was used to evaluate the antimicrobial effects of the peptide towards Bcc strains in cell culture. LDH release from infected cells was used as a measure of cell-membrane damage and loss of cell integrity. Exposure of BEAS-2B cells to the representative strain panel of the Bcc resulted in release of LDH into cell culture medium compared with control cells. The addition of magainin II to the cell culture to a concentration of 25–200 µg ml–1 and subsequent infection with the strains reduced the level of LDH release (Table 2). The degree of protection of BEAS-2B cells from lysis by B. cepacia was measured as the percentage of LDH released compared with the total LDH released after Triton X-100 lysis of the cells. This indicated that 200 µg magainin II ml–1 conferred complete protection to the cells from infection with B. cepacia J2540, but only 20 % protection against B. cenocepacia J2956. However, the peptide offered some protection against infection by all five genomovar strains.
Table 2. Protection afforded to BEAS-2B cells by magainin II against Bcc infection All values represent triplicate samples.
This study describes an evaluation of the antimicrobial potential of several CAMPs against strains of the B. cepacia complex, with the ultimate aim of developing a more efficacious treatment for infections with these organisms. From the panel of antimicrobial peptides analysed, we have reported the novel finding that only magainin II showed moderate activity against Bcc genomovars I–V.Magainins are broad-spectrum, positively charged, antimicrobial peptides that are secreted constitutively from the skin of the African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis) onto the epithelial surface (Zasloff, 1987). These 23 aa peptides exhibit antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal and tumoricidal properties and are considered an essential facet of the innate immune system in preventing infection. Magainin II has previously been described to exert antimicrobial activity against multidrug-resistant bacteria such as meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Giacometti et al., 2005a) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (Giacometti et al., 2000) and against some viruses including herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (Albiol Matanic & Castilla, 2004). We determined that magainin II was the only antimicrobial peptide tested in this study that exerted activity against selected strains of the Bcc. It was bacteriostatic for representative strains of genomovars I, II, III and IV and bactericidal for genomovar V. The strain-to-strain differences observed in IC50 values for magainin II within the Bcc may be a consequence of the extreme genetic diversity within the Bcc group. The large (∼8 Mb) genome is carried on multiple replicons, which may add greater flexibility in the acquisition, loss and expression of genes (Lessie et al., 1996; Mahenthiralingam & Drevinek, 2007).
Owing to the direct antimicrobial activity of CAMPs on the bacterial membrane, acquisition of resistance to these peptides is unlikely considering the highly conserved structure of the target molecule (Hancock & Lehrer, 1998; Matsuzaki et al., 1995). Furthermore, the selection of resistant organisms within a bacterial population would be unlikely because of the rapid and broad-spectrum activity of the peptides and the high metabolic burden of membrane alteration (Hancock & Scott, 2000; Zasloff, 2002). Pathogens exhibiting natural resistance against antimicrobial peptides utilize a range of strategies to render the peptides less effective (Ganz, 2001). Here, we showed that Bcc species produce extracellular proteases that are capable of degrading antimicrobial peptides, a characteristic also described in a number of other pathogens (Schmidtchen et al., 2002; Thwaite et al., 2006). We found that magainin II was unstable at 37 °C in LB broth or culture supernatant, leading to compromised antimicrobial activity. This problem may be ameliorated by the synthesis of magainin II derivatives containing D-amino acids (Bessalle et al., 1990) or β-peptides (Frackenpohl et al., 2001) or the use of non-peptidic antibiotic CAMP mimics (Tew et al., 2006) to provide more stable antimicrobial compounds. Stabilization of magainin II may therefore reduce enzymic degradation and increase the potency of the peptide. Indeed, novel therapeutic compounds based on magainin II are currently under development to maximize activity and decrease proteolytic sensitivity (Fuchs et al., 1998; Gottler & Ramamoorthy, 2008). Magainin II can be used for topical application (Chopra, 1993), but to date has not been evaluated as a nebulized agent for delivery into the lungs of CF patients.
Recent observations have indicated that magainin II acts synergistically with several antibiotics including piperacillin, ceftazidime, imipenem, meropenem, clarithromycin and polymyxin E (Giacometti et al., 2000). A synergistic action with ceftazidime, one of the few antibiotics of choice for treatment of Bcc infections (Rajyaguru & Muszynski, 1997), may be advantageous for a combinational treatment, with the peptide reducing the initial bacterial load and perhaps providing an extended window for antibiotic treatment or possibly enhancing the efficacy of the antibiotic.
Despite the range of virulence factors conferring resistance to antimicrobial peptides, we have shown that magainin II retains moderate antimicrobial activity against Bcc strains in vitro. Further studies are required to determine the utility of the peptide in vivo. However, this peptide has potential advantages over classical antibiotics as an antimicrobial with rapid, broad-spectrum activity and potentially fewer problems associated with resistance.
This work was performed with funding from the UK Ministry of Defence. Published with the permission of the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory on behalf of the Controller of HMSO.References
Albiol Matanic, V. C. & Castilla, V. (2004). Antiviral activity of antimicrobial cationic peptides against Junin virus and herpes simplex virus. Int J Antimicrob Agents 23, 382–389.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bessalle, R., Kapitkovsky, A., Gorea, A., Shalit, I. & Fridkin, M. (1990). All-D-magainin: chirality, antimicrobial activity and proteolytic resistance. FEBS Lett 274, 151–155.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bobek, L. A. & Situ, H. (2003). MUC7 20-mer: investigation of antimicrobial activity, secondary structure, and possible mechanism of antifungal action. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47, 643–652.
Bonacorsi, S., Fitoussi, F., Lhopital, S. & Bingen, B. (1999). Comparative in vitro activities of meropenem, imipenem, temocillin, piperacillin, and ceftazidime in combination with tobramycin, rifampin, or ciprofloxacin against Burkholderia cepacia isolates from patients with cystic fibrosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43, 213–217.
Bowdish, D. M., Davidson, D. J., Scott, M. G. & Hancock, R. E. W. (2005). Immunomodulatory activities of small host defense peptides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49, 1727–1732.
Brogden, K. A., de Lucca, A. J., Bland, J. & Elliott, S. (1996). Isolation of an ovine pulmonary surfactant-associated peptide bactericidal for Pasteurella haemolytica. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93, 412–416.
Chopra, I. (1993). The magainins: antimicrobial peptides with potential for topical application. J Antimicrob Chemother 32, 351–353.
Coenye, T., Vandamme, P., Govan, J. R. W. & Lipuma, J. J. (2001). Taxonomy and identification of the Burkholderia cepacia complex. J Clin Microbiol 39, 3427–3436.
Cole, A. M., Kim, Y. H., Tahk, S., Hong, T., Weis, P., Waring, A. J. & Ganz, T. (2001). Calcitermin, a novel antimicrobial peptide isolated from human airway secretions. FEBS Lett 504, 5–10.[CrossRef][Medline]
Denyer, S. P. & Maillard, J. Y. (2002). Cellular impermeability and uptake of biocides and antibiotics in Gram-negative bacteria. J Appl Microbiol 92, 35S–45S.
Frackenpohl, J., Arvidsson, P. I., Schreiber, J. V. & Seebach, D. (2001). The outstanding biological stability of β- and γ-peptides towards proteolytic enzymes: an in vitro investigation with fifteen peptidases. ChemBioChem 2, 445–455.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fuchs, P. C., Barry, A. L. & Brown, S. D. (1998). In vitro antimicrobial activity of MSI-78, a magainin analog. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42, 1213–1216.
Ganz, T. (2001). Fatal attraction evaded: how pathogenic bacteria resist cationic polypeptides. J Exp Med 193, F31–F33.
Giacometti, A., Cirioni, O., Prete, M. S., Barchiesi, F., Fortuna, M., Drenaggi, D. & Scalise, G. (2000). In vitro activities of membrane-active peptides alone and in combination with clinically used antimicrobial agents against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44, 1716–1719.
Giacometti, A., Cirioni, O., Kamysz, W., Silvestri, C., Licci, A., Riva, A., Lukasiak, J. & Scalise, G. (2005a). In vitro activity of amphibian peptides alone and in combination with antimicrobial agents against multidrug-resistant pathogens isolated from surgical wound infection. Peptides 26, 2111–2116.[CrossRef][Medline]
Giacometti, A., Cirioni, O., Kamysz, W., D'Amato, G., Silvestri, C., Del Prete, M. S., Licci, A., Riva, A., Lukasiak, J. & Scalise, G. (2005b). In vitro activity of the histatin derivative P-113 against multidrug-resistant pathogens responsible for pneumonia in immunocompromised patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49, 1249–1252.
Giovannini, M. G., Poulter, L., Gibson, B. W. & Williams, D. H. (1987). Biosynthesis and degradation of peptides derived from Xenopus laevis prohormones. Biochem J 243, 113–120.[Medline]
Gottler, L. M. & Ramamoorthy, A. (2008). Structure, membrane orientation, mechanism, and function of pexiganan – a highly potent antimicrobial peptide designed from magainin. Biochim Biophys Acta (Epub ahead of print)
Guina, T., Yi, E. C., Wang, H. L., Hackett, M. & Miller, S. I. (2000). A PhoP-regulated outer membrane protease of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurim promotes resistance to α-helical antimicrobial peptides. J Bacteriol 182, 4077–4086.
Hancock, R. E. W. & Lehrer, R. (1998). Cationic peptides: a new source of antibiotics. Trends Biotechnol 16, 82–88.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hancock, R. E. W. & Scott, M. G. (2000). The role of antimicrobial peptides in animal defenses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97, 8856–8861.
Holak, T. A., Engstroem, A., Kraulis, P. J., Lindeberg, G., Bennich, H., Jones, T. A., Gronenborn, A. M. & Clore, G. M. (1988). The solution conformation of the antibacterial peptide cecropin A: a nuclear magnetic resonance and dynamical simulated annealing study. Biochemistry 27, 7620–7629.[CrossRef][Medline]
Isles, A., Maclusky, I., Corey, M., Gold, R., Prober, C., Fleming, P. & Levison, H. (1984). Pseudomonas cepacia infection in cystic fibrosis: an emerging problem. J Pediatr 104, 206–210.[Medline]
Jones, A. M. & Webb, A. K. (2003). Recent advances in cross infection in cystic fibrosis: Burkholderia cepacia complex, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, MRSA and Pandorea spp. J R Soc Med 96 (Suppl. 43), 66–72.
Lessie, T. G., Hendrickson, W., Manning, B. D. & Devereux, R. (1996). Genomic complexity and plasticity of Burkholderia cepacia. FEMS Microbiol Lett 144, 117–128.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lillard, J. W., Jr, Boyaka, P. N., Chertov, O., Oppenheim, J. J. & McGhee, J. R. (1999). The role of antimicrobial peptides in innate immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96, 651–656.
Linde, C. M., Grundström, S., Nordling, E., Refai, E., Brennan, P. J. & Andersson, M. (2005). Conserved structure and function in the granulysin and NK-lysin peptide family. Infect Immun 73, 6332–6339.
Mahenthiralingam, E. & Drevinek, P. (2007). Comparative genomics of Burkholderia species. In Burkholderia: Molecular Biology and Genomics. Edited by T. Coenye & P. Vandamme. Norwich, UK: Horizon Scientific Press.
Mahenthiralingam, E., Coenye, T., Chung, J. W., Speert, D. P., Govan, J. R. W., Taylor, P. & Vandamme, P. (2000). Diagnostically and experimentally useful panel of strains from the Burkholderia cepacia complex. J Clin Microbiol 38, 910–913.
Mahenthiralingam, E., Baldwin, A. & Dowson, C. G. (2008). Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria: opportunistic pathogens with important natural biology. J Appl Microbiol 104, 1539–1551.[Medline]
Matsuzaki, K., Sugishita, K., Fujii, N. & Miyajima, K. (1995). Molecular basis for membrane selectivity of an antimicrobial peptide, magainin 2. Biochemistry 34, 3423–3429.[CrossRef][Medline]
Niyonsaba, F., Iwabuchi, A., Someya, A., Hirata, M., Matsuda, H., Ogawa, H. & Nagaoka, I. (2002). A cathelicidin family of human antibacterial peptide LL-37 induces mast cell chemotaxis. Immunology 106, 20–26.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ohsaki, Y., Gazdar, A. F., Chen, H. C. & Johnson, B. E. (1992). Antitumor activity of magainin analogues against human lung cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 52, 3534–3538.
Ortega, X., Hunt, T. A., Loutet, S., Vinion-Dubiel, A. D., Dutta, A., Choudhury, B., Goldberg, J. B., Carlson, R. & Valvano, M. A. (2005). Reconstitution of O-specific lipopolysaccharide expression in Burkholderia cenocepacia strain J2315, which is associated with transmissible infections in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Bacteriol 187, 1324–1333.
Park, P. W., Pier, G. B., Hinkes, M. T. & Bernfield, M. (2001). Exploitation of syndecan-1 shedding by Pseudomonas aeruginosa enhances virulence. Nature 411, 98–102.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rajyaguru, J. M. & Muszynski, M. J. (1997). Enhancement of Burkholderia cepacia antimicrobial susceptibility by cationic compounds. J Antimicrob Chemother 40, 345–351.
Reik, R., Spilker, T. & Lipuma, J. J. (2005). Distribution of Burkholderia cepacia complex species among isolates recovered from persons with or without cystic fibrosis. J Clin Microbiol 43, 2926–2928.
Schmidtchen, A., Frick, I. M., Andersson, E., Tapper, H. & Björck, L. (2002). Proteinases of common pathogenic bacteria degrade and inactivate the antibacterial peptide LL-37. Mol Microbiol 46, 157–168.[CrossRef][Medline]
Scott, M. G., Yan, H. & Hancock, R. E. W. (1999). Biological properties of structurally related α-helical cationic antimicrobial peptides. Infect Immun 67, 2005–2009.
Sieprawska-Lupa, M., Mydel, P., Krawczyk, K., Wojcik, K., Puklo, M., Lupa, B., Suder, P., Silberring, J., Reed, M. & other authors (2004). Degradation of human antimicrobial peptide LL-37 by Staphylococcus aureus-derived proteinases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48, 4673–4679.
Steinberg, D. A., Hurst, M. A., Fujii, C. A., Kung, A. H., Ho, J. F., Cheng, F. C., Loury, D. J. & Fiddes, J. C. (1997). Protegrin-1: a broad spectrum, rapidly microbicidal peptide with in vivo activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41, 1738–1742.
Tew, G. N., Clements, D., Tang, H. Z., Arnt, L. & Scott, R. W. (2006). Antimicrobial activity of an abiotic host defense peptide mimic. Biochim Biophys Acta 1758, 1387–1392.[Medline]
Thwaite, J. E., Hibbs, S., Titball, R. W. & Atkins, T. P. (2006). Proteolytic degradation of the human antimicrobial peptide LL-37 by Bacillus anthracis may contribute to virulence. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50, 2316–2322.
Vanlaere, E., Lipuma, J. J., Baldwin, A., Henry, D., De Brandt, E., Mahenthiralingam, E., Speert, D., Dowson, C. & Vandamme, P. (2008). Burkholderia latens sp. nov., Burkholderia diffusa sp. nov., Burkholderia arboris sp. nov., Burkholderia seminalis sp. nov. and Burkholderia metallica sp. nov., novel species within the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58, 1580–1590.
Zasloff, M. (1987). Magainins, a class of antimicrobial peptides from Xenopus skin: isolation, characterization of two active forms, and partial cDNA sequence of a precursor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84, 5449–5453.
Zasloff, M. (2002). Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature 415, 389–395.[CrossRef][Medline]
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | J MED MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL | ALL SGM JOURNALS |