Abstract
1 Fédération de Microbiologie Clinique, Hôpital de la Timone, 264 rue Saint-Pierre, 13385 Marseille cedex 05, France
2 Unité des Rickettsies, CNRS-IRD UMR 6236, Faculté de Médecine, Université de la Méditerranée, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille cedex 05, France
Bacteria from the genus Bartonella grow slowly, regardless of the technique used, typically requiring from 7 days to 6 weeks before growth can be detected (Welch, 2005). In addition, these micro-organisms exhibit limited biochemical reactivity, and thus are poorly identified by routine phenotypic methods. Over the past 10 years, amplification-based techniques have been increasingly used to identify Bartonella species. Various molecular targets, including the 16S rRNA gene, 16S–23S rRNA spacer, citrate synthase (gltA), β-subunit of the RNA polymerase (rpoB), riboflavin synthase (ribC), cell division protein (ftsZ), GroEL chaperonin (groEL) and 17 kDa antigen (Bereswill et al., 1999; Houpikian & Raoult, 2001; Sweger et al., 2000; Zeaiter et al., 2002a, b) have been assessed. However, despite their specificity, molecular techniques are expensive, time-consuming and technically demanding.
Recently, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has emerged as a new technique for bacterial species identification (Hsieh et al., 2008). MALDI-TOF MS has been applied with success to Burkholderia cepacia (Vanlaere et al., 2008), Clostridium species (Grosse-Herrenthey et al., 2008), Erwinia species (Sauer et al., 2008), Escherichia coli (Parisi et al., 2008), Listeria species (Barbuddhe et al., 2008), non-fermenting bacteria (Degand et al., 2008; Mellmann et al., 2008), oral anaerobic bacteria (Stingu et al., 2008) and Yersinia enterocolitica (Parisi et al., 2008). Via rapid and reproducible analysis of the peptidic and proteic content, MALDI-TOF MS provides a protein fingerprint specific to a given bacterial strain. However, this technique has not yet been applied to Bartonella species, despite their implication in a variety of animal hosts, arthropod vectors and human diseases. In the present study, we performed MS analysis of representative strains of all recognized Bartonella species that have been cultured.
Bartonella strains. Type strains from 17 recognized Bartonella species were included in our study. Bartonella peromysci and Bartonella talpae, which cannot be cultured, were not evaluated. For B. henselae, we included a type strain for each of the two genotypes, Houston and Marseille. For B. vinsonii, a type strain for each of the three recognized subspecies (vinsonii, arupensis and berkhoffii) was assessed. All strains were grown on Columbia blood agar containing 5 % whole sheep blood (bioMérieux). The strains were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified CO2-enriched environment, except for B. bacilliformis, which was incubated at 28 °C. The Bartonella species and strains studied are detailed in Table 1. For each species, a type strain was used. In addition, in order to estimate the specificity of MALDI-TOF MS, 39 additional Bartonella strains were blind-tested by MS. These included 13 B. henselae, four B. quintana, 20 Bartonella bovis, one Bartonella schoenbuchensis and one Bartonella clarridgeiae strain (Table 1). The B. henselae test strains comprised six and seven strains of the Marseille and Houston genotypes, respectively. Identification of these strains was confirmed by PCR amplification and sequencing of the 16S–23S rRNA spacer, as described previously (Houpikian & Raoult, 2001).Table 1. Strains used in this study
MALDI-TOF MS. For each strain, four isolated colonies were harvested in 20 µl sterile water. One microlitre of each mixture was deposited on a target plate (Bruker Daltonics) in separate sample positions and allowed to dry at room temperature. Two microlitres of matrix solution composed of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (Sigma) saturated with 2.5 % trifluoroacetic acid and 50 % acetonitrile was then added and allowed to co-crystallize with the sample. Samples were processed in an Autoflex II MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) using Flex Control software (Bruker Daltonics). Positive ions were extracted with an accelerating voltage of 20 kV in linear mode. Each spectrum indicates the sum of the ions obtained from 200 laser shots performed in five different regions of the same sample position. Laser shots exhibiting a resolution of <500 were rejected. The spectra were analysed in an m/z range of 2000–20 000, and the analysis was performed with Flex Analysis and BioTyper software. The spectrometer was calibrated every week using the Bruker bacterial test standard (Bruker Daltonics). The data obtained from four replicates were added to minimize random effects. The presence and absence of peaks were considered as fingerprints for a particular isolate. A maximum of 100 peaks with a signal-to-noise ratio of 3 was selected in the range of 3000–15 000 Da. The main spectra were then generated as a reference using all spectra obtained for a single micro-organism. In general, 75 peaks were picked automatically, which occurred for at least 25 % of the spectra and with a mass deviation of 200 p.p.m. From these data, a reference spectrum was determined for each species. The profiles were analysed and compared using ClinPro Tools version 2.1 software (Bruker Daltonics). Scores ≥2.0 were considered significant, as recommended by the manufacturer (Bruker Daltonics). For the blind test, the eight tested strains were compared with the complete Bruker database, along with reference spectra obtained for all 20 Bartonella species tested. Species identification was obtained when a test strain demonstrated a best match with a spectrum in the database, with a log score greater than 2.
The complete set of reference spectra obtained in the present study is available in the URMS database online ().
Using a standard sample preparation and analytical procedure, colony sampling from the agar plate to species identification took 10 min per strain. For multiple strains, we obtained spectra at a rate of 15 strains h–1 at a total cost of 1.65 euros per strain (including personnel costs). Only those peaks with a relative intensity above 0.1 that were constantly present in all four sets of data obtained for a given strain were retained. The standard deviation for each conserved peak did not exceed the 6 m/z value. The set of peaks thus determined was specific to each strain (Fig. 1). When compared with the entire Bruker database, which contains spectra from 2843 bacteria, including 109 alphaproteobacteria but no Bartonella species, the reference spectra obtained for all 20 tested strains were unique, with scores of less than 1.7 for the four spectra obtained for each strain. Within the B. vinsonii species, each subspecies exhibited specific peaks: B. vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii displayed specific peaks at 4500 and 7500 Da, B. vinsonii subsp. vinsonii had specific peaks at 10 200 Da and B. vinsonii subsp. arupensis demonstrated specific peaks at 5300, 5800, 6800, 8000, 11 700 and 12 700 Da. Among the B. henselae species, the spectra were very similar, with the exception of two peaks in the 5000–5500 Da range that were present in the Houston strain but absent in the Marseille strain (Fig. 2). These spectra were added to our URMS MALDI-TOF MS database and are available on the website given in Methods.
|
|
Subsequently, spectra from the 39 blind-tested Bartonella strains were unambiguously identified at the species level with identification scores ≥2.0 when compared with the complete database, with the exception of B. clarridgeiae (1.88) and two B. bovis strains (1.2 and 1.0, respectively). However, in each of these three cases, the highest score obtained indicated the correct species. Reference spectra from these 39 strains were then added to our database. Spectra from all B. quintana strains were identical. Among B. henselae, each Houston and Marseille strain exhibited a score >2.0 against both genotypes, with the score obtained against their homologous genotype being higher than that against the heterologous genotype. We have demonstrated that MALDI-TOF MS is a reliable tool for the identification of Bartonella strains, and we created the URMS database of spectra available online. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to identify members of the genus Bartonella using MS. Although it contains 109 reference spectra from alphaproteobacteria, the Bruker database includes no Bartonella fingerprints.
The ability of Bartonella to cause zoonosis has stimulated investigation of an increasing number of potential animal hosts. This has led to the discovery of many novel Bartonella species in the past decade, including human pathogens. However, Bartonella organisms remain inert in most biochemical tests, and current identification in clinical laboratories is based mostly on gene amplification. In the present study, we obtained specific spectra for each of the currently recognized Bartonella species using MALDI-TOF MS, and demonstrated in a blind test that it reliably identified 39 strains at the species level. It should be emphasized that, in addition to providing accurate identification, MALDI-TOF MS permitted a substantial gain in terms of time prior to identification. In fact, using this method, identification of a given strain was obtained within 15 min after colonies were detected on agar plates, with a mean output of 15 strains h–1. This reduces the delay prior to identification associated with molecular methods by at least 24 h. Moreover, the method was cost-effective, with a total cost of 1.65 euros per strain. This cost was mostly due to personnel charges, as the reagent costs for MALDI-TOF MS are only about \#8364;0.02 per strain.
In addition, we demonstrated that the discriminatory power of MALDI-TOF MS extended beyond the species level for the genus Bartonella. Within the B. vinsonii species, each of the three recognized subspecies (vinsonii, berkhoffii and arupensis) exhibited specific spectra. Within the B. henselae species, representative strains of the Marseille and Houston genotypes initially identified using 16S rRNA gene sequencing (Drancourt et al., 1996) were also differentiated with accuracy, with two peaks in the 5000–5500 Da range specific for the latter genotype (Fig. 2). Six Marseille and seven Houston strains previously identified using 16S rRNA gene PCR and sequencing were correctly discriminated in our blind test, thus demonstrating the accuracy of MS for classifying B. henselae strains. The distribution of these genotypes in cats and humans remains puzzling, with the simultaneous presence of two copies of the 16S rRNA gene in some strains (Viezens & Arvand, 2008) incurring even greater complexity. Therefore, reliable discrimination of B. henselae genotypes using MS might facilitate a better understanding of the population dynamics of this bacterium. In addition to B. henselae, MS was able to identify B. clarridgeiae, a species that is also associated with cats. MS thus appears suited for the rapid identification of Bartonella strains isolated from cats.
In a period when medical costs should be reduced as much as possible, the rapidity, reproducibility and low cost of MALDI-TOF MS demonstrate a major advantage over the usual identification methods. However, we acknowledge the fact that MALDI-TOF MS instruments such as the Autoflex II may not currently be affordable for most clinical microbiology laboratories. Simpler and cheaper MALDI-TOF MS instruments, such as the bench top Microflex (Bruker Daltonics), may soon be used routinely in laboratories without loss of data quality. Thus, not only is MALDI-TOF MS highly species specific for studying genetic variability, but the results obtained are unequivocal and transferable. Another major advantage of MS is that a laboratory technician without any spectrometric background can easily use this method. After depositing the sample and matrix as described in Methods, the spectrometer can be programmed such that the laser automatically impacts the entire surface of the matrix, with no human intervention, in order for the software to perform species identification. In addition, MS spectra are easily stored and compared. To date, however, only proprietary databases are available. To make it an identification tool of interest for the scientific community and allow researchers worldwide to share and compare their MS fingerprints, it might be useful to create a free and autonomous database with dedicated search tools (such as the GenBank database and the BLAST software for nucleotide and amino acid sequences) for MS spectra (Benson et al., 2003; Tatusova & Madden, 1999).
In conclusion, we determined reference MS spectra for all cultivated and recognized Bartonella species. We also demonstrated that MALDI-TOF MS presents several advantages over conventional molecular identification for these bacteria, including rapidity, reliability, reproducibility and low cost. We developed a database comprising spectra for Bartonella strains which any scientist may use to compare a newly isolated strain. We acknowledge that this database may not enable identification of novel species, but will continue to supplement it with spectra obtained from newly described species.
References
Barbuddhe, S. B., Maier, T., Schwarz, G., Kostrzewa, M., Hof, H., Domann, E., Chakraborty, T. & Hain, T. (2008). Rapid identification and typing of Listeria species by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Appl Environ Microbiol 74, 5402–5407.
Benson, D. A., Karsch-Mizrachi, I., Lipman, D. J., Ostell, J. & Wheeler, D. L. (2003). GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 31, 23–27.
Bereswill, S., Hinkelmann, S., Kist, M. & Sander, A. (1999). Molecular analysis of riboflavin synthesis genes in Bartonella henselae and use of the ribC gene for differentiation of Bartonella species by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 37, 3159–3166.
Birtles, R. J., Harrison, T. G., Saunders, N. A. & Molyneux, D. H. (1995). Proposals to unify the genera Grahamella and Bartonella, with descriptions of Bartonella talpae comb. nov., Bartonella peromysci comb. nov., and three new species, Bartonella grahamii sp. nov., Bartonella taylorii sp. nov., and Bartonella doshiae sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 45, 1–8.
Breitschwerdt, E. B. & Kordick, D. L. (2000). Bartonella infection in animals: carriership, reservoir potential, pathogenicity, and zoonotic potential for human infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 13, 428–438.
Daly, J. S., Worthington, M. G., Brenner, D. J., Moss, W. C., Hollis, D. G., Weyant, R. S., Steigerwalt, A. G., Weaver, R. E., Daneshvar, M. I. & O'Connor, S. P. (1993). Rochalimaea elizabethae sp. nov. isolated from a patient with endocarditis. J Clin Microbiol 31, 872–881.
Degand, N., Carbonnelle, E., Dauphin, B., Beretti, J. L., Le, B. M., Sermet-Gaudelus, I., Segonds, C., Berche, P., Nassif, X. & Ferroni, A. (2008). Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for identification of nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli isolated from cystic fibrosis patients. J Clin Microbiol 46, 3361–3367.
Drancourt, M., Birtles, R. J., Chaumentin, G., Vandenesch, F., Etienne, J. & Raoult, D. (1996). New serotype of Bartonella henselae in endocarditis and cat-scratch disease. Lancet 347, 441–443.[CrossRef][Medline]
Grosse-Herrenthey, A., Maier, T., Gessler, F., Schaumann, R., Bohnel, H., Kostrzewa, M. & Kruger, M. (2008). Challenging the problem of clostridial identification with matrix-assisted laser desorption and ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Anaerobe 14, 242–249.[CrossRef][Medline]
Heller, R., Riegel, P., Hansmann, Y., Delacour, G., Bermond, D., Dehio, C., Lamarque, F., Monteil, H., Chomel, B. & Piémont, Y. (1998). Bartonella tribocorum sp. nov., a new Bartonella species isolated from the blood of wild rats. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48, 1333–1339.
Houpikian, P. & Raoult, D. (2001). 16S/23S rRNA intergenic spacer regions for phylogenetic analysis, identification, and subtyping of Bartonella species. J Clin Microbiol 39, 2768–2778.
Hsieh, S. Y., Tseng, C. L., Lee, Y. S., Kuo, A. J., Sun, C. F., Lin, Y. H. & Chen, J. K. (2008). Highly efficient classification and identification of human pathogenic bacteria by MALDI-TOF MS. Mol Cell Proteomics 7, 448–456.
Kerkhoff, F. T., Bergmans, A. M. C., van der Zee, A. & Rothova, A. (1999). Demonstration of Bartonella grahamii DNA in ocular fluids of a patient with neuroretinitis. J Clin Microbiol 37, 4034–4038.
Mellmann, A., Cloud, J., Maier, T., Keckevoet, U., Ramminger, I., Iwen, P., Dunn, J., Hall, G., Wilson, D. & other authors (2008). Evaluation of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry in comparison with 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species identification of nonfermenting bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 46, 1946–1954.
Parisi, D., Magliulo, M., Nanni, P., Casale, M., Forina, M. & Roda, A. (2008). Analysis and classification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and a chemometric approach. Anal Bioanal Chem 391, 2127–2134.[CrossRef][Medline]
Raoult, D., Roblot, F., Rolain, J. M., Besnier, J. M., Loulergue, J., Bastides, F. & Choutet, P. (2006). First isolation of Bartonella alsatica from a valve of a patient with endocarditis. J Clin Microbiol 44, 278–279.
Roux, V., Eykyn, S. J., Wyllie, S. & Raoult, D. (2000). Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii as an agent of afebrile blood culture-negative endocarditis in a human. J Clin Microbiol 38, 1698–1700.
Sauer, S., Freiwald, A., Maier, T., Kube, M., Reinhardt, R., Kostrzewa, M. & Geider, K. (2008). Classification and identification of bacteria by mass spectrometry and computational analysis. PLoS One 3, e2843[CrossRef][Medline]
Stingu, C. S., Rodloff, A. C., Jentsch, H., Schaumann, R. & Eschrich, K. (2008). Rapid identification of oral anaerobic bacteria cultivated from subgingival biofilm by MALDI-TOF-MS. Oral Microbiol Immunol 23, 372–376.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sweger, D., Resto-Ruiz, S., Johnson, D. P., Schmiederer, M., Hawke, N. & Anderson, B. (2000). Conservation of the 17-kilodalton antigen gene within the genus Bartonella. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 7, 251–257.[Medline]
Tatusova, T. A. & Madden, T. L. (1999). BLAST 2 sequences, a new tool for comparing protein and nucleotide sequences. FEMS Microbiol Lett 174, 247–250.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vanlaere, E., Sergeant, K., Dawyndt, P., Kallow, W., Erhard, M., Sutton, H., Dare, D., Devreese, B., Samyn, B. & Vandamme, P. (2008). Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation-time-of of-flight mass spectrometry of intact cells allows rapid identification of Burkholderia cepacia complex. J Microbiol Methods 75, 279–286.[CrossRef][Medline]
Viezens, J. & Arvand, M. (2008). Simultaneous presence of two different copies of the 16S rRNA gene in Bartonella henselae. Microbiology 154, 2881–2886.
Welch, D. F. (2005). Family II. Bartonellaceae Gieszczykiewicz 1939, 25AL. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, pp. 362–370. Edited by D. J. Brenner, N. R. Krieg & J. T. Staley. New York: Springer.
Welch, D. F., Carroll, K. C., Hofmeister, E. K., Persing, D. H., Robison, D. A., Steigerwalt, A. G. & Brenner, D. J. (1999). Isolation of a new subspecies, Bartonella vinsonii subsp. arupensis, from a cattle rancher: identity with isolates found in conjunction with Borrelia burgdorferi and Babesia microti among naturally infected mice. J Clin Microbiol 37, 2598–2601.
Zeaiter, Z., Fournier, P. E., Ogata, H. & Raoult, D. (2002a). Phylogenetic classification of Bartonella species by comparing groEL sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52, 165–171.[Abstract]
Zeaiter, Z., Liang, Z. & Raoult, D. (2002b). Genetic classification and differentiation of Bartonella species based on comparison of partial ftsZ gene sequences. J Clin Microbiol 40, 3641–3647.