Research Article

Hyphal content determines the compression strength of Candida albicans biofilms

Microbiology 2009; 155(6):1997 · https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.021568-0

View at publisher PubMed

Abstract

Candida albicans is the most frequently isolated human fungal pathogen among species causing biofilm-related clinical infections. Mechanical properties of Candida biofilms have hitherto been given no attention, despite the fact that mechanical properties are important for selection of treatment or dispersal of biofilm organisms due to a bodily fluid flow. The aim of this study was to identify the factors that determine the compression strength of Candida biofilms. Biofilms of C. albicans wild-type parental strain Caf2-1, mutant strain Chk24 lacking Chk1p [known to be involved in regulation of morphogenesis (yeast-to-hyphae transition)] and gene-reconstructed strain Chk23 were evaluated for their resistance to compression, along with biofilms of Candida tropicalis GB 9/9 and Candida parapsilosis GB 2/8, derived from used voice prosthetic biofilms. Additionally, cell morphologies within the biofilm, cell-surface hydrophobicities and extracellular polymeric substance composition were determined. Our results suggest that the hyphae-to-yeast ratio influences the compression strength of C. albicans biofilms. Biofilms with a hyphal content >50 % possessed significantly higher compressive strength and were more difficult to destroy by vortexing and sonication than biofilms with a lower hyphal content. However, when the amount of extracellular DNA (eDNA) in biofilms of C. albicans Caf2-1 and Chk24 increased, biofilm strength declined, suggesting that eDNA may influence biofilm integrity adversely.
Abbreviations: eDNA, extracellular DNA; EPS, extracellular polymeric substance; LLCT, low-load compression tester; PMMA, polymethylmethacrylate; QS, quorum sensing
Biofilms are populations of micro-organisms embedded in an extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) (Costerton et al., 1987). The biofilm mode of growth is beneficial for micro-organisms, as it provides a higher degree of stability than a planktonic existence, and organisms within a biofilm are more resistant to environmental challenges (Hall-Stoodley et al., 2004), such as low nutrient availability, high fluid shear and antibiotic and antimicrobial agents (Baker & Banfield, 2003; Battin et al., 2001; Donlan & Costerton, 2002; Elasri & Miller, 1999; Stewart & Costerton, 2001). The damage caused by the formation of biofilms is a widespread problem, ranging from pipeline corrosion and biofouling of ship hulls and food-processing equipment to clinical infections, such as endocarditis and cystic fibrosis pneumonia (Beech & Gaylarde, 1999; Callow & Callow, 2002; Costerton et al., 1999; Kumar & Anand, 1998). Many clinical infections due to biofilms are implant-related and occur when micro-organisms adhere to the surfaces of biomaterials used in, for example, prosthetic heart valves, voice prostheses, joint replacements, vascular grafts and urinary catheters (Costerton et al., 1999; Donlan, 2001).

Biofilms can consist of bacterial or fungal species or a mixture of both. For instance, in the case of vascular catheter-related infections or voice prosthetic biofilms, the most commonly isolated microbial species are Gram-positive Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus, and the fungus Candida albicans (Hampton & Sherertz, 1988), in addition to streptococci found on voice prostheses. Numerous studies have been carried out to investigate bacterial biofilms and their role in infection (Donlan, 2001; Donlan & Costerton, 2002), but fungal biofilms have been given much less attention, despite the fact that they rank fourth in frequency among species causing bloodstream infections (Douglas, 2003). C. albicans is the most frequently isolated fungal species in clinical infections. Other Candida species, such as Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis and Candida dubliniensis, which are comparatively less pathogenic than C. albicans, recently emerged as clinically important pathogens (Moran et al., 2002).

Most Candida species grow as unicellular yeasts, but they are also capable of producing multicellular, filamentous forms of growth, pseudohyphae and pseudomycelium. Two species, C. albicans and C. dubliniensis, can form true hyphae (Calderone, 2002). The morphological transition from the yeast to the hyphal growth form is an important factor in virulence (Lo et al., 1997) and biofilm formation (Richard et al., 2005). Temperatures above 35 °C and pH values of 6.5–7.0 are known to be favourable for germ-tube formation, whilst serum and Lees medium can also induce hyphal growth (Berman & Sudbery, 2002). At a high cell density of 106 cells ml–1 or above, hyphal formation is suppressed. This cell density-dependent effect is known as the inoculum-size effect (Odds, 1988) and resembles quorum sensing (QS) in bacteria. Farnesol is a signalling molecule involved in QS in C. albicans (Hornby et al., 2001). A two-component histidine kinase, Chk1p, has been implicated in the farnesol-mediated response (Kruppa et al., 2004).

What role hyphae play in maintaining fungal biofilm integrity remains unknown. Studies on the role of morphogenesis in the development and pathogenicity of C. albicans biofilms demonstrated that hyphal-defective mutants colonized polyurethane catheters poorly (Shin et al., 2002) and were unable to inhabit plastic surfaces or form biofilms (Krueger et al., 2004). In another study, biofilms of a yeast-negative mutant did not produce any yeast cells and were detached easily from catheter discs, whilst biofilms of a hypha-negative mutant were thin and densely packed with yeast cells (Baillie & Douglas, 1999). In our experience while working with C. albicans biofilms, we observed that mature biofilms of a strain lacking both copies of CHK1 were more resistant to washing. This prompted a further investigation into the factors that influence mechanical properties of C. albicans biofilms, which so far have received no attention. Mechanical properties are important for selection of treatment or dispersal of biofilm organisms due to a bodily fluid flow. In general, the mechanical properties of a biofilm determine the deformation of a biofilm due to an applied force, such as shear originating from blood or urinary flow. Strength is one of the parameters used to describe mechanical properties. It is defined as a material's ability to resist applied forces. Increased fluid shear (Dunsmore et al., 2002; Stoodley et al., 2002), presence of divalent cations (Ca2+) (Korstgens et al., 2001), increased EPS production (Flemming et al., 2000), EPS composition (Wloka et al., 2005) and QS (Davies et al., 1998) are known to affect the strength of bacterial biofilms. For fungal biofilms, the factors affecting biofilm strength still remain to be determined.

EPS production and composition are known to play an important role in maintaining the integrity of bacterial biofilms (Starkey et al., 2004). EPS consists of polysaccharides, proteins and extracellular DNA (eDNA). Polysaccharides represent the most abundant and widely studied component of bacterial EPS. Proteins in EPS have been studied less and it has been suggested that they serve to hold bacteria in a biofilm together via aggregation. Very little is known about the role of eDNA in fungal biofilms. eDNA can be released into EPS by cells or can occur as a result of cell lysis. It has been shown that DNase I can dissolve established bacterial biofilms (Whitchurch et al., 2002). For fungal biofilms, the composition and role of EPS in maintaining biofilm integrity have been studied less than for bacterial biofilms. Al-Fattani & Douglas (2006) showed that EPS of C. albicans and C. tropicalis consists mostly of polysaccharides (30–41 %) with a small amount of protein (3–5 %). Upon application of DNase I, biofilms of C. albicans can be only partially detached from surfaces. In a manner similar to bacterial biofilms, Candida EPS is known to play an important role in drug resistance.

In this study, biofilms of mutant chk1/chk1 (Chk24), the gene-reconstructed chk1/CHK1 (Chk23) and wild-type CHK1/CHK1 (Caf2-1) C. albicans strains, along with two non-albicans Candida species, C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis, isolated from used voice prostheses, were subjected to compression forces in a uniaxial low-load compression tester (LLCT) (Paramonova et al., 2007). Effects of increasing the shear during growth were evaluated only for C. albicans Caf2-1. LLCT evaluates the resistance of biofilms to compression and allows accurate determination of biofilm thicknesses. In addition, cell morphologies within the biofilm, cell-surface hydrophobicities and EPS composition were determined.

Microbial strains, growth conditions and biofilm formation.
C. albicans Caf2-1 (CHK1/CHK1), Chk24 (chk1/chk1) and Chk23 (chk1/CHK1) (Kruppa et al., 2004), C. tropicalis GB 9/9 and C. parapsilosis GB 2/8 grown on tryptone soya broth (Oxoid) agar plates were used to inoculate 10 ml yeast nitrogen base (YNB; Difco) without amino acids (BD) containing 50 mM glucose, prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions with the pH set to 7.0 by using KOH. Cultures were grown at 30 °C for 16 h in ambient air while shaking at 120 r.p.m. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5000 g for 10 min, washed once and resuspended in sterile PBS (NaCl, 8.76 g l–1; K2HPO4, 0.87 g l–1; KH2PO4, 0.68 g l–1; pH 7.0).

Biofilms were grown on 1.5x1.5 cm polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) slides in six-well tissue-culture plates. Prior to growing biofilms, the slides were sterilized with 70 % ethanol, rinsed with sterile, demineralized water and coated with 50 % fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich) for at least 30 min to enhance adhesion (Krom et al., 2007), washed once with sterile PBS and placed into the wells. Three millilitres of cell suspension with a density of 1x107 cells ml–1 in sterile PBS was added to each well and cells were allowed to adhere at 37 °C for 90 min while shaking at 60 r.p.m. The suspension was removed by aspiration and the slides were rinsed with PBS. Biofilm growth was propagated by adding 3 ml YNB (pH 7.0) per well and incubating at 37 °C (or 30 °C in the case of Caf2-1 grown at 30 °C) while shaking at 60 r.p.m. for 72 or 144 h. For increased shear-grown biofilms, biofilms of C. albicans Caf2-1 were incubated while shaking at 90 r.p.m. for 72 h at 37 °C. Afterwards, the medium was discarded and biofilms were washed once with PBS.

Low-load compression testing.
Biofilm resistance against compression was measured during uniaxial compression in an LLCT (Paramonova et al., 2007). The LLCT apparatus consists of a linear positioning stage (Intellistage M-511.5IM; Physik Instrumente) connected to a cylindrical, moving upper plate with a diameter of 2.5 mm (Fig. 1). A stationary bottom plate is fixed to an automatic force-compensating balance (SW 50/300; Wipotec). The positioning stage and the load cell are interfaced to a PC. LabVIEW 7.1 software is used to control the positioning stage and to record the induced load. For biofilm-thickness measurements, the substratum with biofilm was placed on the bottom plate and the top plate was moved downwards until it touched the area of the substratum without biofilm. This position was recorded as the bottom of the biofilm. In the second step, the top plate was moved downwards until it touched the biofilm and this position was recorded as well. Subsequently, biofilm thickness was calculated from the difference between both positions. For compression experiments, a deformation rate of 1 µm s–1 was chosen to enable us to register biofilm response to compression as accurately as possible without dehydrating biofilms during the measurements. Both load and strain (ε), defined as the fractional change in biofilm thickness from the initial contact point to the point where the plunger position was detected, were recorded. The induced load was normalized over the cross-sectional area of the plunger area to calculate the stress (σ) exerted, i.e. the force exerted per unit area of biofilm. Biofilms were compressed until 0.5 (50 %) strain was reached, at which point the compression was stopped because further deformation would only lead to compaction of the biofilms. Three measurements were taken for each independently grown biofilm, and the mean of the three measurements was calculated and used for further analysis. Values of strain were plotted against corresponding values of stress to obtain stress–strain diagrams. These diagrams help to acquire data about a material's strength without regard for its physical size or shape (Hibbeler, 2000). The modulus of elasticity (E) was calculated at an arbitrarily chosen point of 0.2 strain (20 % deformation) by using Hooke's law:



(45K):

Fig. 1. Low-load compression tester (front view), showing main components of the system.

Quantification of biofilm wet weight.
PMMA slides with Candida biofilms were weighed, after which biofilms were scraped off the slides and the weights of the clean slides were measured. The difference between the two measurements yielded the wet weight of the biofilm.

Cell morphology counts.
Biofilm scrapings in PBS were subsequently vortexed for 2 min to break up the matrix. The resulting suspension was sonicated on ice five times for 30 s at 30 W to break up biofilm clumps further. Cooling on ice was done to prevent overheating and lysis. A cell suspension was placed into a Bürker–Türk counting chamber and the numbers of yeast and hyphal cell morphologies were counted by using phase-contrast microscopy (x40 objective lens; Olympus BH-2). Hyphae-to-yeast ratios were calculated from a minimum of 150 cells counted per experiment.

Hydrophobicity measurements.
Hydrophobicities of biofilms were assessed by water-contact angle measurements. Biofilms grown on PMMA slides were air-dried at room temperature, while measuring water-contact angles as a function of drying time (Busscher et al., 1984). Water-contact angles became independent of drying time after 110 min, following which stable water-contact angles could be established for at least a further 1 min. A drop of water was placed on the surface of a biofilm and images were taken from the side, using an Olympus MXR 5010 mounted with a 160 mm x4 macro lens, from which contact angles were calculated by using Contact Angle Measurement System ver. 2.07 software (MT). Measurements were performed in triplicate with independently grown biofilms, with three water droplets measured on each biofilm.

EPS analysis.
For determination of the proteins and eDNA content of EPS, EPS was isolated by using a modification of a protocol developed by Baillie & Douglas (2000). Biofilms were scraped from PMMA slides into PBS. The solution was vortexed vigorously for 3 min to disrupt the biofilms. The cell suspension was centrifuged at 5000 g for 10 min at 10 °C and supernatant was collected for further analysis. Quant-iT Protein Assay and dsDNA HS Assay kits (Molecular Probes) were used to quantify proteins and DNA according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Measurements were performed in triplicate with independently grown biofilms, with two samples measured on each biofilm. Amounts of proteins and DNA were normalized per unit of biofilm wet weight.

Total polysaccharides in the EPS were quantified by using the phenol–sulphuric acid method of DuBois et al. (1956). Biofilms were scraped from PMMA slides into 1 ml PBS. The suspension was mixed with 0.5 ml 1 M NaOH, vortexed and incubated while shaking at room temperature for 15 min. Further, the suspension was centrifuged at 10 000 g for 5 min. Supernatant was collected and mixed with 100 % ice-cold ethanol (0.5 ml supernatant : 1.5 ml ethanol) and placed in the freezer for at least 30 min. After freezing, 1 ml sample was combined with 25 µl aqueous 80 % (v/v) phenol solution in a glass test tube, to which 2.5 ml concentrated sulphuric acid was added rapidly. The tubes were vortexed and the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 10 min, followed by incubation in a 30 °C water bath for 20 min. After cooling to room temperature for 5 min, A490 of the mixtures was measured (neutral polysaccharides). Measurements were performed in triplicate with independently grown biofilms, with two samples measured on each biofilm. Amounts of polysaccharides measured were normalized per unit of biofilm wet weight.

Statistical analysis.
Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS software (Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 14.0.0; SPSS). Before analysis, data were tested for distribution by using a Kolmogorov–Smirnov goodness-of-fit test. Post-hoc multiple comparisons were performed to quantify differences between variables, using a Tukey test with a level of significance of P<0.05.

Hyphal content of C. albicans biofilms ranged from 0 to 79 %, depending on the growth conditions, and biofilms of C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis comprised yeast cells only (Fig. 2). Hyphal content of C. albicans Caf2-1 biofilms increased slightly with higher shear and decreased in older biofilms. When the growth temperature of C. albicans Caf2-1 was reduced to 30 °C, hyphal content dropped to zero. There was no change in the hyphal content of C. albicans Chk24 biofilms over time.



(26K):

Fig. 2. Hyphal content of Candida biofilms. Error bars represent SD over nine independently grown biofilms.

Analysis of EPS content of the biofilms showed that polysaccharide content was significantly lower in 6-day-old biofilm of C. albicans compared with that of other biofilms studied (Fig. 3a). Protein content of EPS was variable across the different fungal biofilms and was highest for 3-day-old C. tropicalis biofilms (Fig. 3b). The amount of eDNA was also variable across the biofilms and was higher in 6-day-old biofilms of C. albicans than in 3-day-old biofilms. The eDNA content was highest for C. albicans Caf2-1 grown at 30 °C (Fig. 3c).



(14K):

Fig. 3. Amounts of (a) polysaccharides, (b) proteins and (c) eDNA in the EPS of Candida biofilms, normalized with respect to the biofilm's wet weight. Error bars represent SD over nine independently grown biofilms.

Stress–strain curves (Fig. 4) showed that biofilms containing hyphae were able to withstand higher compressive forces than biofilms without hyphae, whilst hyphae content was influenced by growth temperature, shear rate during growth and the specific strain involved.



(24K):

Fig. 4. Averaged stress–strain curves for (a) biofilms of C. albicans containing hyphal cells and (b) biofilms of Candida strains without hyphal cells. Note the different scales. Error bars represent SD over nine independently grown biofilms.

All biofilms, with the exception of C. tropicalis, had similar thicknesses, ranging from 150 to 340 µm. C. tropicalis and all C. albicans biofilms were hydrophobic, with contact angles >5 °. Biofilms of C. parapsilosis were hydrophilic (Fig. 5). However, none of these parameters showed a systematic variation with biofilm strength, as can also be seen in Fig. 5.



(33K):

Fig. 5. Moduli of elasticity (E) of Candida biofilms with biofilm characteristics, found to be unrelated to biofilm strength. Error bars represent SD over nine independently grown biofilms.
Hyphal content was found to be a determining parameter for the strength of fungal biofilms (Fig. 6). Biofilms with a high hyphal content were more resistant to compression and more difficult to disturb by vortexing and sonification than biofilms with a lower hyphal content. The weakest biofilms consisted of yeast cells only. It appears that there was a linear relationship (linear correlation coefficient, R2=0.943) between biofilm strength and hyphal content in 3-day-old Candida biofilms (Fig. 6a). Interestingly, the biofilms without hyphae and with the highest eDNA content, C. albicans Caf2-1 grown at 30 °C, possessed the lowest compressive strength.



(11K):

Fig. 6. Modulus of elasticity (E) as a function of (a) hyphal content in 3-day-old Candida biofilms and (b) eDNA amount in C. albicans Caf2-1 and Chk24 biofilms. Arrows in (b) indicate the decrease in strength upon increasing the growth time of C. albicans Caf2-1 and Chk24 biofilms from 3 to 6 days and increasing the shear rate during growth for C. albicans Caf2-1, which is concurrent with increased amounts of eDNA; for the strains presented, the hyphal content remains approximately constant.

In C. albicans, hyphal production can be suppressed not only by reducing the growth temperature (Berman & Sudbery, 2002), but also by the presence of farnesol, a QS molecule (Hornby et al., 2001). Here we see that, in the absence of CHK1, more hyphal cells are produced in the biofilms of Chk24 than in biofilms of the wild-type strain Caf2-1, resulting in stronger biofilms. Interestingly, 6-day-old biofilms for Caf2-1 showed a significant reduction in hyphal content that was not seen for the strain lacking Chk1p. This could therefore illustrate the effect of farnesol inducing yeast-cell growth in wild-type biofilms, whereas mutant biofilms are unable to sense farnesol and maintain a high hyphal content. Growth of C. albicans Caf2-1 under higher shear conditions also induced more hyphal production, although not to the extent that they were significantly stronger than Caf2-1 biofilms grown under lower shear.

Hyphal and yeast cells do not differ qualitatively in cell-wall composition. The main differences, however, are in the proportions of the main components, such as chitin or β-glucans (Chauhan et al., 2002). The cell wall of C. albicans consists of 80–90 % carbohydrates, most important of which are β-glucans (β-1,3 and β-1,6 glucose polymers), accounting for 47–60 % of cell-wall weight; chitin, which constitutes 0.6–9.0 %; and mannan, polymers of mannose bound covalently to proteins. Even though the chitin content of the cell wall is small, it is an important component of the septa, bud scars and the ring around the constriction between mother cell and bud. Hyphal cells contain at least three times as much chitin as yeast cells (Braun & Calderone, 1978; Chaffin et al., 1998). Chitin is a hydrophobic material that is also found in insects, crabs, shrimps and lobsters, where it provides rigidity to the outer skeleton. Chitin has been shown to increase the mechanical and flexural strength of bone substitutes (Chen et al., 2005). A higher amount of chitin, due to the presence of more hyphal cells in biofilms, may be responsible for increased compressive strength of the biofilm.

Furthermore, eDNA content in EPS showed an adverse effect on biofilm strength of C. albicans Caf2-1 and Chk24. EPS amount and composition were previously shown by others to have a significant influence on the structure and cohesiveness of bacterial biofilms (Flemming et al., 2000). Moreover, the presence of eDNA was shown to affect biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Whitchurch et al., 2002). In our study, we see that normalized amounts of eDNA increased with biofilm age and shear (Fig. 3c) and contributed to the decrease in strength of C. albicans Caf2-1 and Chk24 biofilms with approximately similar hyphal content, as suggested in Fig. 6(b). In 6-day-old biofilms of Chk24, strength decreased by 33 % compared with that of 3-day-old biofilms, while hyphal content remained unchanged. In 3-day-old biofilms of Caf2-1, strength of biofilms grown at higher shear decreased slightly compared with that of biofilms grown at normal shear, while the amount of eDNA increased and, here too, hyphal content remained similar. Six-day-old biofilms of Caf2-1 showed a 23 % decrease in hyphal content, concurrent with a 60 % increase in the amount of eDNA and a major decrease in biofilm strength. This suggests that eDNA probably does not play the same essential role in Candida biofilms as it does in bacterial biofilms. This is in line with recent observations that bacterial biofilms can be fully removed by DNase I treatment (Nemoto et al., 2003), whereas Candida biofilms were removed by only 30 % (Al-Fattani & Douglas, 2006).

In addition to changes in eDNA content, polysaccharide and protein contents in EPS varied with biofilm age. Polysaccharide content decreased in ageing biofilms while protein content increased, probably due to cell lysis. Neither polysaccharides nor proteins seemed to contribute significantly to biofilm strength. Additionally, no correlation was found between biofilm thickness and hydrophobicity.

This study contributes to a thin body of knowledge of fungal biofilm mechanics and helps to gain knowledge of which parameters are important for fungal biofilm strength. We show that hyphal cells are the most sturdy components in fungal biofilms and that their presence is determinant for the compression strength of C. albicans biofilms. However, fungal biofilm strength can be affected adversely by the presence of eDNA. Without hyphae, fungal biofilms are weaker and can be removed more easily. Understanding what factors are important for biofilm integrity may help in the development of new fungal-specific drugs.

The authors would like to thank M. Kruppa and R. Calderone (Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA) for providing the C. albicans strains used in this study, and R. A. M. Meijering for valuable discussions.

Edited by: C. Picioreanu

References

Al-Fattani, M. A. & Douglas, L. J. (2006). Biofilm matrix of Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis: chemical composition and role in drug resistance. J Med Microbiol 55, 999–1008.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Baillie, G. S. & Douglas, L. J. (1999). Role of dimorphism in the development of Candida albicans biofilms. J Med Microbiol 48, 671–679.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Baillie, G. S. & Douglas, L. J. (2000). Matrix polymers of Candida biofilms and their possible role in biofilm resistance to antifungal agents. J Antimicrob Chemother 46, 397–403.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Baker, B. J. & Banfield, J. F. (2003). Microbial communities in acid mine drainage. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 44, 139–152.[CrossRef][Medline]

Battin, T. J., Wille, A., Sattler, B. & Psenner, R. (2001). Phylogenetic and functional heterogeneity of sediment biofilms along environmental gradients in a glacial stream. Appl Environ Microbiol 67, 799–807.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Beech, I. B. & Gaylarde, C. C. (1999). Recent advances in the study of biocorrosion: an overview. Rev Microbiol 30, 177–190.

Berman, J. & Sudbery, P. E. (2002). Candida albicans: a molecular revolution built on lessons from budding yeast. Nat Rev Genet 3, 918–930.[CrossRef][Medline]

Braun, P. C. & Calderone, R. A. (1978). Chitin synthesis in Candida albicans – comparison of yeast and hyphal forms. J Bacteriol 133, 1472–1477.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Busscher, H. J., Weerkamp, A. H., van der Mei, H. C., van Pelt, A. W. J., de Jong, H. P. & Arends, J. (1984). Measurement of the surface free-energy of bacterial-cell surfaces and its relevance for adhesion. Appl Environ Microbiol 48, 980–983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Calderone, R. A. (2002). Taxonomy and biology of Candida. In Candida and Candidiasis, pp. 15–27. Edited by R. A. Calderone. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.

Callow, M. E. & Callow, J. A. (2002). Marine biofouling: a sticky problem. Biologist (London) 49, 10–14.[Medline]

Chaffin, W. L., Lopez-Ribot, J. L., Casanova, M., Gozalbo, D. & Martinez, J. P. (1998). Cell wall and secreted proteins of Candida albicans: identification, function, and expression. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62, 130–180.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chauhan, N., Li, D. M., Singh, P., Calderone, R. & Kruppa, M. (2002). The cell wall of Candida spp. In Candida and Candidiasis, pp. 159–175. Edited by R. Calderone. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.

Chen, B. Q., Sun, K. & Ren, T. (2005). Mechanical and viscoelastic properties of chitin fiber reinforced poly(ε-caprolactone). Eur Polym J 41, 453–457.[CrossRef]

Costerton, J. W., Cheng, K. J., Geesey, G. G., Ladd, T. I., Nickel, J. C., Dasgupta, M. & Marrie, T. J. (1987). Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Annu Rev Microbiol 41, 435–464.[CrossRef][Medline]

Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S. & Greenberg, E. P. (1999). Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284, 1318–1322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R., Pearson, J. P., Iglewski, B. H., Costerton, J. W. & Greenberg, E. P. (1998). The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm. Science 280, 295–298.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Donlan, R. M. (2001). Biofilms and device-associated infections. Emerg Infect Dis 7, 277–281.[Medline]

Donlan, R. M. & Costerton, J. W. (2002). Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 15, 167–193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Douglas, L. J. (2003). Candida biofilms and their role in infection. Trends Microbiol 11, 30–36.[CrossRef][Medline]

DuBois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A. & Smith, F. (1956). Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28, 350–356.

Dunsmore, B. C., Jacobsen, A., Hall-Stoodley, L., Bass, C. J., Lappin-Scott, H. M. & Stoodley, P. (2002). The influence of fluid shear on the structure and material properties of sulphate-reducing bacterial biofilms. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 29, 347–353.[CrossRef][Medline]

Elasri, M. O. & Miller, R. V. (1999). Study of the response of a biofilm bacterial community to UV radiation. Appl Environ Microbiol 65, 2025–2031.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Flemming, H.-C., Wingender, J., Mayer, C., Korstgens, V. & Borchard, W. (2000). Cohesiveness in biofilm matrix polymers. In Community Structure and Cooperation in Biofilms, pp. 87–105. Edited by D. Allison, P. Gilbert, H. M. Lappin-Scott & M. Wilson. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Hall-Stoodley, L., Costerton, J. W. & Stoodley, P. (2004). Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol 2, 95–108.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hampton, A. A. & Sherertz, R. J. (1988). Vascular-access infections in hospitalized patients. Surg Clin North Am 68, 57–71.[Medline]

Hibbeler, R. C. (2000). Mechanics of Materials. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hornby, J. M., Jensen, E. C., Lisec, A. D., Tasto, J. J., Jahnke, B., Shoemaker, R., Dussault, P. & Nickerson, K. W. (2001). Quorum sensing in the dimorphic fungus Candida albicans is mediated by farnesol. Appl Environ Microbiol 67, 2982–2992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Korstgens, V., Flemming, H. C., Wingender, J. & Borchard, W. (2001). Influence of calcium ions on the mechanical properties of a model biofilm of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Water Sci Technol 43, 49–57.[Medline]

Krom, B. P., Cohen, J. B., Feser, G. E. M. & Cihlar, R. L. (2007). Optimized candidal biofilm microtiter assay. J Microbiol Methods 68, 421–423.[CrossRef][Medline]

Krueger, K. E., Ghosh, A. K., Krom, B. P. & Cihlar, R. L. (2004). Deletion of the NOT4 gene impairs hyphal development and pathogenicity in Candida albicans. Microbiology 150, 229–240.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kruppa, M., Krom, B. P., Chauhan, N., Bambach, A. V., Cihlar, R. L. & Calderone, R. A. (2004). The two-component signal transduction protein Chk1p regulates quorum sensing in Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell 3, 1062–1065.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kumar, C. G. & Anand, S. K. (1998). Significance of microbial biofilms in food industry: a review. Int J Food Microbiol 42, 9–27.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lo, H. J., Kohler, J. R., DiDomenico, B., Loebenberg, D., Cacciapuoti, A. & Fink, G. R. (1997). Nonfilamentous C. albicans mutants are avirulent. Cell 90, 939–949.[CrossRef][Medline]

Moran, G. P., Sullivan, D. J. & Coleman, D. C. (2002). Emergence of non-Candida albicans Candida species as pathogens. In Candida and Candidiasis, pp. 37–53. Edited by R. A. Calderone. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.

Nemoto, K., Hirota, K., Murakami, K., Taniguti, K., Murata, H., Viducic, D. & Miyake, Y. (2003). Effect of Varidase (streptodornase) on biofilm formed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Chemotherapy 49, 121–125.[CrossRef][Medline]

Odds, F. C. (1988). Candida and Candidosis. London, UK: Baillier Tindall.

Paramonova, E., de Jong, E. D., Krom, B. P., van der Mei, H. C., Busscher, H. J. & Sharma, P. K. (2007). Low-load compression testing: a novel way of measuring biofilm thickness. Appl Environ Microbiol 73, 7023–7028.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Richard, M. L., Nobile, C. J., Bruno, V. M. & Mitchell, A. P. (2005). Candida albicans biofilm-defective mutants. Eukaryot Cell 4, 1493–1502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shin, J. H., Kee, S. J., Shin, M. G., Kim, S. H., Shin, D. H., Lee, S. K., Suh, S. P. & Ryang, D. W. (2002). Biofilm production by isolates of Candida species recovered from nonneutropenic patients: comparison of bloodstream isolates with isolates from other sources. J Clin Microbiol 40, 1244–1248.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Starkey, M., Gray, K. A., Chang, S. I. & Parsek, M. R. (2004). A sticky business: the extracellular polymeric substance matrix of bacterial biofilms. In Microbial Biofilms, pp. 174–191. Edited by M. Ghannoum & G. A. O'Toole. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.

Stewart, P. S. & Costerton, J. W. (2001). Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet 358, 135–138.[CrossRef][Medline]

Stoodley, P., Cargo, R., Rupp, C. J., Wilson, S. & Klapper, I. (2002). Biofilm material properties as related to shear-induced deformation and detachment phenomena. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 29, 361–367.[CrossRef][Medline]

Whitchurch, C. B., Tolker-Nielsen, T., Ragas, P. C. & Mattick, J. S. (2002). Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation. Science 295, 1487[Free Full Text]

Wloka, M., Rehage, H., Flemming, H.-C. & Wingender, J. (2005). Structure and rheological behaviour of the extracellular polymeric substance network of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Biofilms 2, 275–283.[CrossRef]

Received 20 June 2008; revised 27 February 2009; accepted 6 April 2009.



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 Society for General Microbiology.