Abstract
The atomic structure of the E1 fusion protein of SF virus has recently been determined (Lescar et al., 2001). Unexpectedly, these data showed that this protein is structurally homologous to the E fusion protein of flaviviruses (Rey et al., 1995). Furthermore, sequence homology analyses have indicated that the E protein of hepatitis C virus is structurally homologous to these proteins (Yagnik et al., 2000). These data suggest that the fusion proteins of flaviviruses and hepatitis C virus may also form ion-permeable pores in the target membrane after fusion. The experiments reported herein analyse this question for the E protein of flaviviruses using the flavivirus West Nile (WN) virus. The experiments identify the formation of ion-permeable pores during WN virus entry at the plasma membrane and analyse the possible role of these pores during multiplication of alpha- and flaviviruses.
Growth of cells and preparation of viruses.WN virus was grown in BHK-21 cells and purified by centrifugation as described previously (Castle et al., 1985). Growth and purification of alphaviruses were as described previously (Wengler et al., 1999). Aedes albopictus C2 insect cells (Singh, 1967) were grown at 28 °C and were adapted in our laboratory to Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) with 4 % foetal bovine serum and 2 % Yeastolate (Wengler et al., 1978). Vero cells were grown in DMEM with 5 % foetal bovine serum.
Preparation of [3H]choline-loaded liposomes.
Liposomes were prepared as described previously (Wengler et al., 2003), but the procedure was scaled down and liposomes were loaded with [3H]choline during their preparation. Liposomes were prepared from phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylcholine (PC), sphingomyelin (SPM) and cholesterol. These lipids (350 µg) in the proportions indicated in the experiments were solubilized in 10 µl 1-propanol. [3H]Choline (40 µCi) was dried down and solubilized in 150 µl buffer containing 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8·1. This buffer and the lipid solution were kept at 50 °C and 7·5 µl of lipid was injected through a microinjection loading pipette (Eppendorf) into the buffer containing [3H]choline under stirring. After incubation at 50 °C for 1 min and at 22 °C for 5 min, the opalescent solution was loaded on to a column containing 9 ml Sephadex G-25 in 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8·1. The liposomes eluted in the excluded volume and contained about 0·1 % of the radioactivity. Liposomes were stored on ice and used within 5 days.
Assay of [3H]choline release from liposomes.
The assay was performed as described previously (Wengler et al., 2003). In short, for each reaction 30 µl 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8·1, containing about 20 µg UV-inactivated virus and 5 µg liposomes was incubated at 30 °C in a 10K Nanosep ultrafiltration vial. The reaction was adjusted to the desired pH by addition of 10 µl MES buffer. After 15 min incubation, the reaction vials were centrifuged, and radioactivity released from liposomes was recovered in the filtrate.
Patch-clamp analysis of membrane permeability.
Patch-clamp measurements (Hamill et al., 1981) were performed as described previously (Wengler et al., 2003). In short, for whole-cell patch-clamp analysis, cells were incubated for 510 min in extracellular solution (140 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 2 mM CaCl2, 10 mM glucose, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7·4, adjusted with NaOH). The recording pipette contained an intracellular solution composed of 140 mM potassium glutamate, 10 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2 and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7·3, adjusted with KOH. Pellets containing UV-inactivated WN virus particles, which had been stored at -80 °C, were suspended in extracellular solution containing 2 % Ficoll 400 to a concentration of 100 µg E protein ml-1 and used for adsorption. Virus had been inactivated by UV illumination at 254 nm for 8 min at 4 °C. The same suspension and inactivation were performed for SF virus particles, which contained 100 µg E1 protein ml-1. No infectivity was detected in 50 µl of virus suspension by ID50 measurements using the cytolytic effect of SF and WN virus in BHK cells. Virus suspension (40 µl) was transferred to the surrounding of the patch-clamped cell. This suspension contained about 4 µg of the viral fusion protein. After 3 min incubation at 20 °C for virus adsorption, 100 µl of low pH solution consisting of extracellular solution with 3 % Ficoll 400, buffered either with 10 mM HEPES at pH values between 8·0 and 6·2, or with 10 mM MES at lower pH, was applied to the surrounding of the patch-clamped cell.
Determination of intracellular Ca2+ concentration by fluorescence microscopy.
The intracellular concentration of Ca2+ was determined ratiometrically using the fluorescence of Fura-2 (Silver, 1998). BHK cells grown on glass coverslips were loaded with Fura-2 by incubation in extracellular solution containing Fura-2-AM (5 µg ml-1) and Pluronic F-127 (10 µg ml-1) for 20 min at 37 °C. Cells were then observed by fluorescence microscopy in the presence of extracellular solution. Excitation was at 340 and 380 nm. Emission was determined at 510 nm. The intracellular Ca2+ concentration was determined ratiometrically from these data using the Metafluor imaging software.
In vitro translation.
A master mix containing 100 µl micrococcal nuclease-treated rabbit reticulocyte lysate (Promega), 3 µl unlabelled amino acids (1 mM) without methionine, 5 µl 10 % (v/v) NP-40 in water and 50 µCi [35S]methionine was divided into five identical aliquots. To these aliquots on ice was added either 5 µl water, 5 µl 42S WN genome RNA (2·5 µg), 5 µl WN virus suspended in water (containing about 20 µg E protein), 5 µl SF genome RNA (2·5 µg) or 5 µl SF virus suspended in water (containing about 20 µg E1 protein). The reactions were incubated at 30 °C and aliquots of 4 µl were removed after incubation for 20, 40, 60 and 80 min and subjected to SDS-PAGE. The gel was stained with Coomassie blue and subjected to autoradiography.
A reasonable starting point for the development of an assay of the ability of the membrane proteins of flaviviruses to form a pore in the target membrane after fusion was to develop a liposome preparation that would release [3H]choline from the liposomal interior after fusion with virus particles. Recently, we have used this approach with alphaviruses (Wengler et al., 2003). The fusion of flaviviruses with liposomes has been studied previously (Gollins & Porterfield, 1986; Corver et al., 2000; Stiasny et al., 2001). Fusion of flaviviruses with liposomes composed of PC, PE, SPM and cholesterol has already been obtained at mildly acid pH. Following these lines, we prepared different liposomes composed of PC, PE, SPM and cholesterol in varying proportions containing [3H]choline in the interior aqueous phase, and analysed the release of [3H]choline in the presence of WN virus as a function of pH. BSA, which should not release [3H]choline, and SF virus, which forms pores in liposomes (Wengler et al., 2003), were also analysed in these assays. A pH-dependent release of [3H]choline in the presence of WN virus was detected. A typical reaction is shown in Fig. 1(A). Maximal release of [3H]choline from liposomes containing all four lipids in equimolar concentrations occurred at pH 6·5 in the case of WN virus particles. At this pH, no release was obtained by SF virus particles, which have a threshold for release of pH 6·0. These data are in accordance with the earlier experimental findings cited above. The release of [3H]choline by WN virus was always less efficient than the release generated by SF virus. Furthermore, the analysis showed that the threshold for [3H]choline release by WN virus was dependent on the lipid composition, in contrast to the situation for alphaviruses (data not shown). These results led to the question of whether WN virus might release [3H]choline from appropriate liposomes that were already at neutral pH. The data presented in Fig. 1(B) showed that this was the case for liposomes containing PC, PE, SPM and cholesterol in the molar proportions 1 : 0 : 1 : 2. In our analysis of [3H]choline release, a pH of 6·2 or lower was always necessary for the alphaviruses SF or SIN, whereas in the case of WN virus release occurred at pH values between 7·2 and 6·5, depending on the composition of the liposomes.
|
Analysis of membrane permeability during early steps of virus infection
The experiments described above support the hypothesis that the membrane proteins of the WN virus form an ion-permeable pore in the target membrane after fusion. A standard procedure for the identification of such pores is the measurement of membrane permeability by the patch-clamp technique (Hamill et al., 1981). It has been shown that WN virus particles fuse with the plasma membrane at pH 6·4 (Kimura et al., 1986). We therefore used the plasma membrane as the target membrane for WN virus infection and pore formation in an analysis involving three steps: (i) membrane current of a single cell was monitored in the whole-cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique; (ii) virus was applied to the surroundings of the cell and allowed to adsorb to the cell membrane; and (iii) fusion of virus particles with the plasma membrane was induced by addition of buffer of low pH. The experiments were performed at 21 °C. Recently, we successfully performed this experimental approach using the SF alphavirus (Wengler et al., 2003). Original traces obtained in such experiments are shown in Fig. 2. In the experiment shown in Fig. 2(A), WN virus particles containing 4 µg E protein were added to Vero cells and fusion was induced by incubation at pH 5·4. Within a few seconds of low pH treatment, a distinct transient increase in membrane current, caused by the opening and closure of a number of single pores, could be detected (refer to Fig. 5A for a detailed depiction of single pore events). The number of these events was reduced if the amount of virus used during adsorption was reduced (data not shown). In the experiment reported in Fig. 2(B), virus particles were mixed with low pH (pH 5·4) buffer prior to adsorption to the patch-clamped cell. No pores were formed under these conditions. Virus particles pretreated at low pH, or the low pH itself, therefore had no effect on membrane permeability. Fig. 2(C) shows currentvoltage relationships of the membrane currents of Vero cells in the presence of WN virus prior to and after addition of low pH solution. The membrane potential shifted from -25·3±2 mV (SEM, n=11) to nearly 0. Under the physiological ionic conditions used in the patch-clamp experiments, the reversal potential was +58 mV for an Na+-selective current and -98·7 mV for a K+-selective current. The finding that the reversal potential of the virus-induced, fast-activating, voltage-independent current was -2·9±3·1 mV (SEM, n=8) indicated that the pores were non-selective, at least for cations such as Na+ and K+. The currentvoltage relationship after acid activation shown in Fig. 2(C) did not exactly match a straight line, although a linear curve would be expected for non-specific ionic currents of ohmic (=voltage-independent) behaviour. The determination of the currentvoltage relationships takes about 3 s (see Fig. 2 legend), whereas the open times of the pores are mostly less than 0·1 s (see Fig. 5). Therefore, different groups of pores were open during the ten individual membrane current measurements at the different membrane potentials. This led to the observed mismatches of the currentvoltage relationship. Further currentvoltage analyses showed that the virus-induced current was transient and that about 3 min after acid treatment the membrane regained its original permeability properties (n=3). Analyses involving BHK-21 cells (Fig. 2D), a cell line that is used in our laboratory to propagate WN virus, indicated that the pores were also permeable to Ca2+. In these cells, inflow of Ca2+ through the pores led to rapid opening of Ca2+-activated K+ channels, which generated an outward K+ current with a positive current amplitude. This K+ current inactivated within about 30 s after its maximal activation and was followed by the development of distinct pore-induced non-selective membrane currents (n=3).
|
|
These data show that during low pH-induced infection of BHK cells, Ca2+-permeable pores are formed in the plasma membrane. A further experiment that identifies these pores is shown in Fig. 3. Low pH-induced virus entry was performed using cells that were not subjected to patch-clamp conditions, but were preloaded with the Ca2+-sensitive fluorescent dye Fura-2. Since the extracellular medium and the cellular cytoplasm contain Ca2+ concentrations of 2 mM and about 0·1 µM, respectively, a strong inflow of Ca2+ into the cytoplasm should occur during virus entry, which increases the cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration directly and possibly by the release of intracellular Ca2+. Changes in intracellular Ca2+ concentration are determined from the fluorescence intensity of the Fura-2 dye using fluorescence microscopy. False colour representations of intracellular Ca2+ concentration are shown in Fig. 3. It can be seen that entry of WN virus led to a rapid increase in the cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration. Most of the cells restored their original Ca2+ concentration within 4 min. A similar process occurred during entry of SF virus and was not observed in control experiments in the absence of virus particles (data not shown).
|
Flaviviruses and alphaviruses multiply in insect cells. Therefore, we compared the formation of pores in the cell membrane of A. albopictus C2 insect cells by WN virus and SF virus as shown in Fig. 4. In this experiment, two consecutive steps of acid activation were performed. WN virus particles had already led to pore formation at pH 6·6 (Fig. 4A), whereas SF virus particles were inactive even at pH 6·2 and needed a lower pH to induce pores (Fig. 4B). The total membrane current in the presence of SF virus was about four times greater than the current in the presence of WN virus (882±229 pA, SEM, n=8 for SF; 217±66 pA, SEM, n=28 for WN) and persisted for about three times longer. During pore formation by WN virus particles in C2 cells, a voltage-independent membrane current was induced with a reversal potential of -2·9±2·6 mV (SEM, n=6) and a normal membrane potential was restored during the recovery process (n=12, data not shown).
|
Analyses of individual pores generated in the plasma membrane of C2 insect cells are presented in Fig. 5. Fig. 5(A) shows a 10 s time interval from a standard experiment involving WN virus particles containing 4 µg E protein. Individual pores are easily recognized. The analysis of the individual current amplitudes (Fig. 5B) showed a heterogeneous distribution with a first peak of about 12 pA, corresponding to a pore conductance of about 300 pS. Heterogeneity also existed in the distribution of the open times of the pores (Fig. 5C). Although about 80 % of the pores showed open times shorter than 0·1 s, some events lasted longer than 2 s. The arrows in Fig. 5(A) indicate the opening of pores that persisted for several seconds. For comparison, corresponding analyses of pores generated in the membrane of C2 cells during entry of SF virus are presented in Fig. 5(A'C'). In a standard experiment involving SF virus particles containing 4 µg of E1 fusion protein, a rather large current flowed through the membrane of C2 cells (Fig. 4B) and individual pores could rarely be differentiated. In order to generate a number of pores that allowed differentiation of single events, comparable with the experiment presented in Fig. 5(A), the number of SF virus particles used during adsorption had to be reduced 100-fold to about 0·04 µg E1 protein (Fig. 5A'). The distributions of pore currents and of opening times are shown in Fig. 5(B') and (C'). The pores that were generated by WN virus and SF virus were rather similar in the distribution patterns of pore currents and opening times. A peak for SF virus-induced single pore amplitudes existed at about 12 pA and about 62 % of the pores showed open times of less than 0·1 s. Identical analyses as presented in Fig. 5 were also performed using Vero cells. The results obtained matched those presented in Fig. 5, with a similar distribution of pore amplitudes and pore open times (data not shown).
Analysis of a possible role of pores in endosomes during virus infection
A major pathway for infection of cells by alphaviruses and flaviviruses is the endosomal pathway. The data described above indicate that ion-permeable pores are formed in the endosomal membrane after fusion. Data supporting this interpretation are presented in Fig. 6. In this experiment, the co-entry of virus and the membrane-impermeable protein synthesis inhibitor hygromycin B was analysed. It has been shown by Carrasco (1981) that during the entry of virus particles in a number of virus systems, including the SF virus, co-entry of hygromycin B into the cytoplasm occurs (for a review, see Carrasco, 1995). The data presented in Fig. 6 show a comparison of this effect for WN and SF virus. Co-entry of hygromycin B occurred during entry of both viruses, but WN virus was much less effective.
|
During replication of alphaviruses, viral cores accumulate as stable structures in the cytoplasm of infected cells. A specific process is therefore necessary for disassembly of cores in the early stages of infection. During multiplication of flaviviruses, an accumulation of cores is not observed. Instead, the cores of flaviviruses are apparently generated during the process of virus budding (for a review, see Lindenbach & Rice, 2001). It is therefore possible that the core of flaviviruses, which enters the cytoplasm early in infection, is a labile structure that does not need a specific disassembly process in order to allow translation of the viral genome. An experimental analysis that addressed this question is shown in Fig. 7. The autoradiogram presented shows the products generated by in vitro translation reactions in rabbit reticulocyte lysates containing as template the genome RNA of WN virus, the core of WN virus, the genome RNA of SF virus or the core of SF virus. The core of flaviviruses aggregates after removal of the viral membrane. Therefore, all in vitro translations were performed in the presence of 0·5 % NP-40 detergent, and virus particles were added as templates to study the translation of viral cores. NP-40 solubilizes the membrane of alpha- and flaviviruses and liberates the viral core ribonucleoprotein complex within the reticulocyte lysate. It can be seen that the genome RNA molecules of alpha- and flaviviruses were translated into a series of proteins. On the other hand, it was evident that the core of the SF alphavirus could not be translated, whereas the core of the WN flavivirus had an activity in in vitro protein synthesis that was similar to that of purified WN virus genome RNA.
|
The data involving the release of [3H]choline from liposomes are in accordance with earlier experiments in which fusion of flaviviruses with liposomes was analysed by determination of the transfer of [3H]uridine-labelled viral genome RNA into the lumen of liposomes (Gollins & Porterfield, 1986) or by analyses of mixing of fluorescent-labelled viral lipids into the liposomal membrane (Corver et al., 2000). The major new findings reported here are the identification of the release of [3H]choline from liposomes by WN virus and the description of a virusliposome system in which the threshold of [3H]choline release was pH 7·4 and maximal release was obtained at pH 7·0.
The pores generated during entry of WN virus and SF virus show a number of similarities. The pores generated by WN virus are permeable to Na+, K+ and Ca2+ and the same permeabilities have been described for the SF virus pores (Wengler et al., 2003). Furthermore, the data presented in Fig. 5 show that WN and SF virus particles generate similar pores during entry into C2 insect cells. The pores are heterogeneous in individual currents and opening times. In both systems a relatively large number of pores that allow currents of 12 pA or multiples of 12 pA are generated and the majority of pores have opening times of less than 100 ms. Similar pores are also formed during entry of both viruses into Vero cells (data not shown).
The structural organization formed after fusion by the alphavirus E1 protein (for reviews, see Garoff et al., 1994; Helenius, 1995; Kielian, 1995) and the flavivirus E protein (for a review, see Heinz & Allison, 2000) have been studied intensively. Both proteins are class II fusion proteins that form an icosahedral shell on the viral surface (Lescar et al., 2001; Pletnev et al., 2001). This assembly is reorganized during fusion and the fusion active state is a short-lived intermediate in this reaction. At the end of this process, both proteins are present in the target membrane as homotrimers. The data discussed above indicate that these homotrimers might during a certain stage of their existence form pores that allow the flow of ions between the lumen of the endosome and the cytoplasm. An individual particle of SF virus or WN virus contains 240 molecules of E1 or 180 molecules of E, respectively (Kuhn et al., 2002). Fusion of an SF or WN virus particle therefore could generate up to 80 or 60 homotrimers, respectively, in the target membrane. These data indicate that the generation of this set of trimers represents the formation of a single pore measured in the patch-clamp analyses. It is not unlikely that during entry of each individual virus particle, the number of trimers that form ion-permeable structures in the target membrane is variable and generally less than the maximal number possible. This fact could explain the heterogeneity in current permeabilities of the pores.
The experiments reported above show that the number of pores and the total current that flows through the plasma membrane in a standard experiment involving virus particles containing 4 µg of fusion protein is much higher for SF virus than for WN virus (see Fig. 4, and data not shown). The small number of pores formed by WN virus particles probably reflects to some extent the small number of infectious particles present in the WN virus preparation. The E and E1 fusion proteins both have a molecular mass of about 50 kDa. Since an individual particle of SF virus and WN virus contains 240 molecules of E1 and 180 molecules of E, respectively, the number of physical particles present in a standard experiment is slightly larger for WN virus than for SF virus. However, for the WN virus preparation the ratio of physical particles to plaque-forming particles is about 600 (Wengler & Wengler, 1989) but is only about 8 for the SF virus preparation (data not shown). Therefore, the number of infectious particles is about 100-fold higher in the standard experiment with SF particles than with WN particles. In the experiments reported in Fig. 5, the concentration of virus particles was adjusted to obtain a similar number of fusion events to allow us to identify the formation of individual pores. In these experiments, WN virus particles and SF virus particles containing 4 µg of E protein and 0·04 µg of E1 protein, respectively, were used. Under these conditions, therefore, the number of infectious particles present in both virus preparations was similar in spite of the ∼100-fold difference in the number of physical particles. The low efficiency of co-entry of hygromycin B in the presence of WN virus particles, as compared with SF virus particles, also probably reflects the relatively small number of infectious WN virus particles present in the endosome.
The formation of ion-permeable pores in the target membrane by viral structural proteins during the early stages of infection leads to a significant alteration in the conceptual and practical analysis of this process. Infection would involve three steps: (i) fusion and transfer of the internal complex of the virus into the cytoplasm; (ii) insertion of ion-permeable pores in the target membrane during or after fusion; and (iii) flow of appropriate ions through these pores, which regulates further processes necessary for virus replication. Spyr et al. (1995) have presented evidence that ion-permeable pores may be generated by E1 protein already at low pH in the membrane of SF virus particles. The experiments reported in this and in our previous work (Wengler et al., 2003) do not allow detection of such pores. Further experiments are necessary to determine whether the ion-permeable pores that are detected in our experiments have already been formed before the generation of the fusion pore, as indicated by the work of Spyr et al. (1995), and then persist in the target membrane after fusion.
The alphavirus core is a stable structure that does not allow direct translation of the viral genome. The alphaviruses have probably evolved a process of low pH-induced disassembly of cores (Wengler & Wengler, 2002). A fusion process dependent on low pH is therefore appropriate for these viruses. Only in such a system are fusion and pore formation accompanied by a flow of protons, which generates a region of low pH necessary for core disassembly at the appropriate time and place. Extensive experimental evidence shows that flaviviruses can infect cells by a low pH-dependent endosomal route (for a review, see Heinz & Allison, 2001). The low pH-dependent release of [3H]choline from liposomes, the patch-clamp analyses of membrane current and single pore events, and the analyses of co-entry of hygromycin B reported above indicate that a pore is formed in the endosomal membrane in this route of WN virus infection. However, the entry of flaviviruses may not be restricted to this pathway but may occur also at neutral pH. The processes involved in virus entry at neutral pH have been reviewed recently (Sieczkarski & Whittaker, 2002). Electron microscopic analyses of virus entry indicate that flaviviruses can enter cells at the plasma membrane in a low pH-independent way (Hase et al., 1989a, b). The results concerning the release of [3H]choline from liposomes at neutral pH reported above indicate that the fusion activity of the WN virus surface protein may be activated at neutral pH by contact with a patch of membrane of appropriate lipid composition. Furthermore, the in vitro translation experiments show that the WN genome RNA present in the viral core is accessible for translation. These data indicate that a proton flow through the pore formed during virus entry may not be necessary in the case of flaviviruses and that entry at an appropriate plasma membrane at neutral pH may be possible for flaviviruses and may lead to productive infection. Further studies are necessary to clarify this question.
This study was supported by grant RE 1046/1-2 to H. R. and by grant WE 518/3-3 to G. W. from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. We thank Dr R. T. C. Huang for advice in the preparation of liposomes. A. K. and G. W. made equal contributions to this work.References
Carrasco, L. (1995). Modification of membrane permeability by animal viruses. Adv Virus Res 45, 61112.[Medline]
Castle, E., Nowak, T., Leidner, U., Wengler, G. & Wengler, G. (1985). Sequence analysis of the viral core protein and the membrane-associated proteins V1 and NV2 of the flavivirus West Nile virus and of the genome sequence for these proteins. Virology 145, 227236.[CrossRef][Medline]
Corver, J., Ortiz, A., Allison, S. L., Schalich, J., Heinz, F. X. & Wilschut, J. (2000). Membrane fusion activity of tick-borne encephalitis virus and recombinant subviral particles in a liposomal model system. Virology 269, 3746.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dick, M., Barth, B. U. & Kempf, C. (1996). The E1 protein is mandatory for pore formation by Semliki Forest virus spikes. Virology 220, 204207.[CrossRef][Medline]
Garoff, H., Wilschut, J., Liljeström, P. & 7 other authors (1994). Assembly and entry mechansims of Semliki Forest virus. Arch Virol 9, 329338.
Gollins, S. W. & Porterfield, J. S. (1986). pH-dependent fusion between the flavivirus West Nile and liposomal model membranes. J Gen Virol 67, 157166.
Hamill, O. P., Marty, A., Neher, E., Sakmann, B. & Sigworth, F. J. (1981). Improved patch-clamp techniques for high resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflügers Arch 391, 85100.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hase, T., Summers, P. L. & Eckels, K. H. (1989a). Flavivirus entry into cultured mosquito cells and human peripheral blood monocytes. Arch Virol 104, 129143.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hase, T., Summers, P. L. & Cohen, W. H. (1989b). A comparative study of entry modes into C6/36 cells by Semliki Forest and Japanese encephalitis viruses. Arch Virol 108, 101114.[CrossRef][Medline]
Heinz, F. X. & Allison, S. L. (2000). Structures and mechanisms in flavivirus fusion. Adv Virus Res 55, 231269.[CrossRef][Medline]
Heinz, F. X. & Allison, S. L. (2001). The machinery for flavivirus fusion with host cell membranes. Curr Opin Microbiol 4, 450455.[CrossRef][Medline]
Helenius, A. (1995). Alphavirus and flavivirus glycoproteins: structures and functions. Cell 81, 651653.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hernandez, L. D., Hoffman, L. R., Wolfsberg, T. G. & White, J. M. (1996). Viruscell and cellcell fusion. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 12, 627661.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kielian, M. (1995). Membrane fusion and the alphavirus life cycle. Adv Virus Res 45, 113151.[Medline]
Kimura, T., Simon, W., Gollins, S. W. & Porterfield, J. S. (1986). The effect of pH on the early interaction of West Nile virus with P388D1 cells. J Gen Virol 67, 24232433.
Kuhn, R. J., Zhang, W., Rossmann, M. G. & 9 other authors (2002). Structure of dengue virus: implications for flavivirus organization, maturation, and fusion. Cell 108, 717725.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lanzrein, M., Weingart, R. & Kempf, C. (1993). pH-dependent pore formation in Semliki Forest virus-infected Aedes albopictus cells. Virology 193, 296302.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lescar, J., Roussel, A., Wien, M. W., Navaza, J., Fuller, S. D., Wengler, G., Wengler, G. & Rey, F. A. (2001). The fusion glycoprotein shell of Semliki Forest virus: an icosahedral assembly primed for fusogenic activation at endosomal pH. Cell 105, 137148.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lindenbach, B. D. & Rice, C. M. (2001). Flaviviridae: the viruses and their replication. In Fields Virology, 4th edn, pp. 9911041. Edited by D. M. Knipe & P. M. Howley. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Mackenzie, J. S., Barrett, A. D. T. & Deubel, V. (2002). Japanese Encephalitis and West Nile Viruses. Berlin, Heidelberg & New York: Springer-Verlag.
Nyfeler, S., Senn, K. & Kempf, C. (2001). Expression of Semliki Forest virus E1 protein in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 276, 1545315457.
Pletnev, T. S., Zhang, S. V., Mukhopadhyay, W., Fisher, S., Hernandez, B. R., Brown, R., Baker, D. T., Rossmann, M. G. & Kuhn, R. J. (2001). Locations of carbohydrate sites on alphavirus glycoproteins show that E1 forms an icosahedral scaffold. Cell 105, 127136.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rey, F. A., Heinz, F. X., Mandl, C., Kunz, C. & Harrison, S. C. (1995). The envelope glycoprotein from tick-borne encephalitis virus at 2 Å resolution. Nature 375, 291298.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schlesinger, S. & Schlesinger, M. J. (2001). Togaviridae: the viruses and their replication. In Fields Virology, 4th edn, pp. 895916. Edited by D. M. Knipe & P. M. Howley. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Sieczkarski, S. B. & Whittaker, G. R. (2002). Dissecting virus entry via endocytosis. J Gen Virol 83, 15351545.
Silver, R. B. (1998). Ratio imaging: practical considerations for measuring intracellular calcium and pH in living tissue. Methods Cell Biol 56, 237251.[Medline]
Singh, K. R. P. (1967). Cell cultures derived from larvae of Aedes albopictus (Skuse) and Aedes aegypti (L.). Curr Sci 36, 505506.
Spyr, C. A., Kasermann, F. & Kempf, C. (1995). Identification of the pore forming element of Semliki Forest spikes. FEBS Lett 375, 134136.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stiasny, K., Allison, S. L., Mandl, C. W. & Heinz, F. X. (2001). Role of metastability and acidic pH in membrane fusion by tick-borne encephalitis virus. J Virol 75, 73927398.
Strauss, J. H. & Strauss, E. G. (1994). The alphaviruses: gene expression, replication and evolution. Microbiol Rev 58, 491562.
van Regenmortel, M. H. V., Fauquet, C. M., Bishop, D. H. L., Carstens, E. B., Estes, M. K., Lemon, S. M., Maniloff, J., Mayo, M. A., McGeoch, D. J., Pringle, C. R. & Wickner, R. B. (2000). Virus Taxonomy. Seventh Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. San Diego: Academic Press.
Wengler, G. & Wengler, G. (1989). Cell-associated West Nile flavivirus is covered with E+PreM protein heterodimers which are destroyed and reorganized by proteolytic cleavage during virus release. J Virol 63, 25212526.
Wengler, G. & Wengler, G. (2002). In vitro analyses of factors involved in the disassembly of Sindbis virus cores by 60S ribosomal subunits identify a possible role of low pH in this process. J Gen Virol 83, 24172426.
Wengler, G., Wengler, G. & Gross, H. J. (1978). Studies on virus-specific nucleic acids synthesized in vertebrate and mosquito cells infected with flaviviruses. Virology 89, 423437.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wengler, G., Wengler, G. & Rey, F. A. (1999). The isolation of the ectodomain of the alphavirus E1 protein as a soluble hemagglutinin and its crystallization. Virology 257, 472482.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wengler, G., Koschinski, A., Wengler, G. & Dreyer, F. (2003). Entry of alphaviruses at the plasma membrane converts the viral surface proteins into an ion-permeable pore that can be detected by electrophysiological analyses of whole-cell membrane currents. J Gen Virol 84, 173181.
Yagnik, A. T., Lahm, A., Meola, A., Roccasecca, R. M., Ercole, B. B., Nicosia, A. & Tramontano, A. (2000). A model for the hepatitis C virus envelope glycoprotein E2. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 40, 355366.[CrossRef][Medline]
Received 23 December 2002; accepted 25 February 2003.